Maybe the articles should be rearranged so that January comes up under 1, February under 2, etc.--Erl 22:18, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

• We've tryed that, but it changed the way the category was lettered (numbered). Also, look at Wikipedia's. Theirs is still in this format, and a person shouldn't really surf the dates via the category but via a template. -- Riffsyphon1024 22:21, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • True dat. Sorry, just slipped out--Erl 01:42, 29 March 2006 (UTC)
• I see that the dates have finally all been made. -- Riffsyphon1024 22:45, 30 October 2006 (UTC)