As the battle raged on, the Alliance succeeded in destroying the Death Star's reactor core.[2] Teshik was able to escape the battlestation before its destruction, returning to the Eleemosynary. When an Imperial retreat was sounded, Teshik opted to remain behind in the Endor system with his command ship and continue to fight the Rebels. Three hours later, the Alliance succeeded in disabling the Eleemosynary with a barrage of ion cannon fire.[1] The destroyer and its commander were both captured by Alliance forces;[3] Teshik was later executed.[1]
The Star Destroyer Eleemosynary was commanded by Osvald Teshik, a Grand Admiral whose body was 75% artificial. Teshik was a tactical genius dedicated to serving the Empire, standing his ground even when faced with overwhelming odds against success. This was evident in the closing stage of the Battle of Endor, but his refusal to retreat resulted in his capture by the Alliance and his eventual execution by the Alliance's successor state, the New Republic.[1]
"NOTE:'Eleemosynary' means 'supported by charity.' (I had to look that up in the dictionary and have no idea how it relates to Teshik, so that must have been one of Abel's.)"
In an early version of Who's Who: Imperial Grand Admirals, titled "Dirty Dozen: Imperial Grand Admirals," the Eleemosynary was established as being an Imperial-class Star Destroyer. When the article was reworked for inclusion in Star Wars Insider, several details regarding the Grand Admirals and their flagships were omitted. The Eleemosynary's class was one such piece of information that was cut.[4][5]
The New Essential Chronology introduces some confusion regarding when the Eleemosynary was disabled. While Who's Who indicates that the Imperial retreat was sounded three hours before Teshik and his ship were captured by the Alliance, The New Essential Chronology states that CaptainGilad Pellaeon of the Star DestroyerChimaera ordered the withdrawal after the Eleemosynary was disabled, four hours after the second Death Star's destruction. This article assumes the chronology presented in Who's Who is correct.