Forum:CT Archive/Labyrinth of Evil vs. Clone Wars

This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus Track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record.
The result of the debate was canonicity isn't up to us, unfortunately. -- Ozzel 04:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

reading Roron Corobb and Foul Moudama's articles, i noticed one (Corobb's) described events as happened in Labyrinth of Evil, while Moudama's described events as shown in the Clone Wars. I think we should hold a vote to decide which version of events we should have in the relevant articles. The 3 options are (1) Clone Wars, (2) Labyrinth of Evil and (3) A mix of the two (i.e.the two other Jedi were there, but were killed by Greivous straight away. Then Corobb, Moudama & Shaak-Ti ran away and Greivous chased them etc...)AdmirableAckbar 15:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Option 1: Clone Wars

[edit] Option 2: Labyrinth of Evil

[edit] Option 3: Mixture

1. AdmirableAckbar 15:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

A mixture probably won't work. And I think this should be at the consensus track. Unit 8311 15:01, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

• This is ludicrous. You can't vote on canon. Period. The two accounts should be listed, or one should be listed in the article and the other in BTS. Atarumaster88 ^{(Talk page)} 15:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • fair enough, but we need to decide. Some articles have CW, while some have LoE. we need to choose one and stick to it AdmirableAckbar 15:06, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
• I really don't think this is something that needs, or even should be, voted on. Kuralyov 15:17, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I agree with Kuralyov and Atarumaster. The cartoon and LOE simply screwed up.Unit 8311 15:18, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
    • Also, let me just point out that other articles have been fine with a conflicting storyline. CIP, Mace Windu and Second Battle of Coruscant, the latter of which at one time achieved FA status. Atarumaster88 ^{(Talk page)} 16:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
      • Generally it seems to be fine to put what we ABSOLUTELY know (someone was present somewhere) in the article and conflicting information (prolonged battle/near-instant death) in the BTS. It's up to future sources to determine which is canonical, not us. Wildyoda 21:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC)