This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus Track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record. The result of the debate was keep Template:Conjecture on articles, closed early per Snowball Clause.jSarek 08:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Some articles will never be given a name, such as the article on the clone scout who tried to assassinate Yoda on Kashyyyk will probably never be given a name. Yet, these articles have a distracting "Master Who?" tag marking them as conjectural.
Should the tags be kept on articles that will never be given a name? Jedi Master Chief 01:09, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
How do you know they will never be given a name? - JMAS 01:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Keep the tags. First of all, we have no way of knowing who will someday get a name and who will not; I consider it INCREDIBLY likely that the example given above will get his name (or number, rather) at some point. But more importantly, these tags are vital to point out that a given topic has been placed under a title that isn't their actual name, and has no canonical basis. jSarek 01:23, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
The tag's right; the name is conjectural. These names were created by users, not by Georgre Lucus or other Star Wars authorities. Readers must be aware of there facts. They must be kept. Michaeldsuarez(Activate Holocron) 03:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)