This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made in the Senate Hall or new Consensus Track pages rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record. The result of the debate was no consensus.jSarek 03:37, 9 December 2007 (UTC)
2/3rds supermajority of users, 2/3rds supermajority of admins, unanimous support from voting bureaucrats.
Simple majority of all users, with bureaucrat vetoEdit
This would allow a single bureaucrat to veto a rollback rights request, but otherwise work simply by counting votes. Bureaucrats who fail to vote at all over the two weeks would be assumed not to object.
Given that this is a quicker way to revert, a majority with veto seems sufficient. -Fnlayson 23:23, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
I think this power is safe enough for us to hand it out like candy to most of our contributors. It just lets them do in one click what would normally take three. jSarek 01:30, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Not really that important to worry about the wrong people using this. And who would abuse rollbacks anyway? ;) -- Riffsyphon1024 05:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)