Shouldn't the Sith Emperor article be merged with Naga Sadow? This link to the IGN website pretty much confirms that this Sith emperor is indeed Sadow.--Jedi Kasra (talk) 16:32, 12 February 2009 (UTC)

  • No, it only says he lead the Sith, which has already been in canon for years, but it also says that they were rebuffed and had been growing by the time of the game hundreds of years later, he would be dead by then unless Bioware does something insame. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 02:01, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
    • Reading it again, I see that it does say he was the Sith Emperor. Tahank you for jumping the shark, BioWare. NaruHina Talk Anakinsolo 05:08, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
      • IGN isn't canon. If you read the history summaries from the TOR website, it seems like they got the same thing and assumed that Sadow, the last person mentioned to lead the Sith, remained the Emperor. There's no evidence that's the case on the site or elsewhere. - Lord Hydronium 06:17, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.