This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments or questions on this topic should be made in a new Senate Hall page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record. Toprawa and Ralltiir (talk) 05:50, February 19, 2013 (UTC)
Yesterday, an anonymous user created several articles based on parts of a Flight helmet. I saw some of these articles and immiediately suspected they were fanon, due to the obviousness of the appearances chosen (All of the films except PM), but the anon later inserted an official picture into those articles, which verfied them as canon. I wasn't sure whether these articles were needed, and the anon still thought that they were when I asked them, so I figured I'd see what other people thought. The articles in question are...
This, my friend, is what the Trash compactor is for. Be bold and put them up for deletion! You'll definitely get a much larger response that way. Menkooroo (talk) 14:55, December 24, 2012 (UTC)
If these are named widgets that are parts of other helmets, I think they're perfectly notable and worthy of articles. Feel free to nominate them for deletion, but I'm not sure why that's necessary. ~Savage 17:57, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
I worked on cleaning up these articles. The image was there when I saw them, which as it was given as a source makes these parts completely canon. And notability is not of concern here since we have articles on the smallest things imaginable here, but canon. -- Riffsyphon1024 11:45, January 4, 2013 (UTC)
Yeah, I see no problem keeping them. Stake blackmsg 11:52, January 4, 2013 (UTC)