This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments or questions on this topic should be made in a new Senate Hall page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record. —MJ— _Comlink 19:05, November 26, 2012 (UTC)

---

The Main Page has looked more or less the same since I first became an active member—that goes back to 2007. This has got to change. I think it's time a community-wide discussion is held concerning what can be done to make this site more presentable to the internet at large. In the past, petty arguments between groups of users of differing mentalities have stalled any actual change or improvement for the Main Page, just minor additions that look the same as the content that was already there. Fear of change, as well, and charming hipster mentality that we don't need to be cool has stifled movement toward self-improvement. After a year-long absence that I thought at the time would be permanent, I return to a very different Wookieepedia, one that seems to be dying in terms of interest from the established users. As well, there are about half as people editing per month as we had back at our peak in 2008. Although there are many new users, most of them very positive and enthusiastic about using the site as it already is, but I wonder how many more could be attracted if the Main Page was revamped. It is in this spirit that I would like to engage on a Crusade to make sure something happens as far as the Main Page is concerned. This is not an admin establishment or old guard movement, but one driven by a user who has spent more time as a reader than an editor in recent years and sees a site that is actually less accessible than it was five years ago.

Please discuss this with me and feel free to add any new sections or make arguments. I am not out to have my way or the highway, but I am sure plenty will agree that some action needs to be taken. Promoting discussion is the entire point of this thread, looking forward to CTs or Mofference items that will change the most viewed page on the site. graestan^(talk) 17:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

Contents 1 Header 2 Current Sections 2.1 click for article navigation 2.2 Quote of the Day 2.3 Featured article 2.4 Did you know… 2.5 Official friends of Wookieepedia 2.6 Random articles 2.7 In the news 2.8 Wookieepedia Newsnet 2.9 On this day… 2.10 Wookieepedian of the Month 3 Possible Future Sections 3.1 Featured image 4 Layout 4.1 Portals 5 Discussion 6 Wikia layout revamp and Main Page woes

HeaderEdit

• "Click the text link" is getting really old. This looks like Internet 1995. We've got to come up with something more presentable; virtually every other website on the internet has a better header. Even just logo images would be better. graestan^(talk) 17:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • What exactly are you referring to here? The "The Star Wars encyclopedia that anyone can edit." part, or the general saturation of text links in the main page? I agree that the former should be changed, but there isn't much that could be done about the latter. Some of the links could be excised (such as the redundant interlang links below the article count), but a lot of them are useful to have on a main page. —NAYAYEN 01:18, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Current SectionsEdit

click for article navigationEdit

• When I used to come to the site simply to read, this was extremely useful. It would be better to have it visible on the Main Page like Jedipedia does than to reduce it to another case of "click the text link." graestan^(talk) 17:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • I think this is, without a doubt, the most important thing on the main page by a long way (the only thing that comes close is the FA). Having this converted to something more interactive that doesn't waste space, and that makes use of the images, would be great. Possibly have two versions of it, one by era and the other by medium (comic, video game, reference book etc) could work. I'll try to get a Photoshop mockup of my idea for this soon, as promised on IRC. —NAYAYEN 01:18, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
    • I think that Graestan is referring to the bit that displays this. --Eyrezer 20:58, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
      • Yeah, that's what I mean. While it's a useful page, it used to be, in smaller form, on the Main Page back when all I did was read Wookieepedia. It is a very useful tool for readers. Makes the site more user-friendly. With a hundred blue text links on the Main Page, this is not prominent whatsoever. graestan^(talk) 21:24, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
        • I know, I was referring to that bit too :P Doesn't it expand down on the main page when you click the "Click here for article navigation" link? That's what it does for me. —NAYAYEN 23:23, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Quote of the DayEdit

• I actually don't have any improvements to suggest on this section. I think it's awesome. But I want this to be open to suggestion, too. graestan^(talk) 17:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Possibly add a link to the calendar-format archive? Not much needs changing with this. —NAYAYEN 01:18, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
    • Yeah, the archive takes ages to open. It would be nice if we could remedy that somehow. ~Savage 15:39, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
      • I support a calender system for the quotes as it would make for a lot less lag.--Commander Code-8 ^{To say hi, press 42} 09:20, October 4, 2012 (UTC)

Featured articleEdit

• Seeing the same image and article every time you open the Main Page for days on end is a bit of a bore, and I realize we can't make it to one FA per day again anytime soon, so I was thinking something along the lines of all four FAs for a two-week period going in a slow slideshow or loading randomly during each two-week period. graestan^(talk) 17:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm assuming that you want us to discuss each topic under each header? If so, here goes. For this one, I would like to see something done with the Featured articles on the Main Page. The idea of bringing people back everyday is a good idea. The part I don't like is the slideshow idea. I've seen different slideshows on various wikis, and, while not a slam to those wikis, I don't like it. The text is very difficult to read for most of the time. It overall looks cumbersome and annoying. Like I said, while I would like to see something new on the Main Page everyday, perhaps even doing something with the Good Article of the Day thing that is being discussed at the Mofference, but I don't believe a slideshow is the way to do it.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 22:51, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm not a fan of the slide show idea, for the same reasoning as Cal, but randomizing the article that appears upon viewing the Main Page isn't a bad idea. Bella'Mia 09:05, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
  • Is it possible to make the image that shows up random? I mean, if we have a main page FA that has several images, could the template be set up to randomly display one of those rather than only have one image per FA? I know for some FAs there are no images, and for some not all images are pertinent to illustrate the article as a whole, but for many FAs, there are likely several good candidates for main page display images. Seems a shame not to exploit that. ~Savage 15:42, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
    • Randomization could be done. Something like [[File:{{#switch: {{#expr:{{#time:U}} mod 4}} |0=InfoboxImage.jpg |1=BookCover.jpg |2=FilmScreenshot.jpg |3=FourthOption.png}}|150px|link=Article name]] would work. Simply assign the various options to sequential numbers starting with zero and set the value after "mod" to the total number of options. For the Luddites among us, I could toss that into a foolproof template that would do everything in the previous sentence automatically. —MJ— _{War Room} Friday, March 2, 2012, 21:57 UTC
      • Wouldn't <choose><option></option></choose> work? 1358 ^(Talk) 22:06, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
        • [facepalm] I forgot Wikia had that. Yeah, that would be much easier. —MJ— _{Council Chambers} Saturday, March 3, 2012, 03:26 UTC
• Given the fact that it appears we'll be showcasing a new GA everyday on the mainpage, I feel that the current FA system is no longer much of a problem. Lengthy articles get featured for half a week (key word there is "featured") and the GAs march on one a day. Seems like a stable dynamic that doesn't deprive the average visitor of new content. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 07:31, March 14, 2012 (UTC)

Did you know…Edit

• Again, a great section. I have no suggestions. graestan^(talk) 17:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • This isn't really changing the look, but how about we talk about allowing more than just brand new articles onto the list? There are plenty of fun preexisting articles buried in the Wook, but they don't get any attention because, like most small articles before the CAN, we made them and stopped thinking of them. NaruHina ^Talk 00:01, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
    • We could do like Wikipedia and allow significant expansions as well. Allowing new CAs could be done also. Master Jonathan (Jedi Council Chambers) Thursday, February 2, 2012, 16:44 UTC
      • I'm not a fan of the idea of an anything-goes DYK. If anything could be added at any time, I could see new entries being buried pretty quickly. Reserving it for new articles is, IMO, something that's not broken and doesn't need fixing, save for maybe a "from Wookieepedia's newest articles" appearing after "Did you know..." just so that readers are aware that new content is being shown off. Menkooroo 20:54, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
        • Keeping it the same, that would be a good addition. Especially because if the rule it should be new is actually written somewhere it's hard to find. However, the few times I've added things to that list I've personally honored a bit of a grace period between them so the list doesn't just scroll. I think common-sense on that front will prevail, but we've misjudged things over that in the past. NaruHina ^Talk 21:06, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
        • Personally, I don't think entries being buried too quickly is a realistic threat. We've had the feature for quite a while, and people are constantly making new articles on a myriad of subjects...yet the Did You Know section has always seemed to hold its entries for a reasonable period of time. I feel as though personal discretion has worked rather well in the past, and don't see a real concern for a sudden surge if we allowed entries from, for instance, significantly lengthy expansions or articles recently deemed Comprehensive. Bella'Mia 09:05, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
• The German Star Wars wiki has "Did You Know..." for Featured and Good articles (See Main Page here), judging by the icons. This is another option. --Eyrezer 02:24, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • I think that we could allow it to include both new and comprehensive articles. That might add a bit of variety and get comprehensive articles a bit more attention from casual readers. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 04:30, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Just another vote for keeping it reserved for new articles but also allowing for significant expansions (however we define that). I mean, if we take a stub and turn it into a 1,000 KB article, that's worth showcasing with factoids too. Other than that, though, keep the old stuff out. ~Savage 15:45, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
• I feel I need to say here that some of the did you know facts are a bit lame. One we have at the moment is that puppetry performances were hosted in the Naboo Puppet Theater?--Commander Code-8 ^{To say hi, press 42} 09:20, October 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • I thought for the longest time that it was limited to administrators, but everyone is actually free to update Did You Know. If you ever create an article that you think is interesting (or if you spy one in Special:Newpages), feel free to add it to DYK (and the Did You Know archive). Menkooroo (talk) 16:10, October 5, 2012 (UTC)

Official friends of WookieepediaEdit

• This could be given a facelift. A scrolling bar of logos for the sites would be cool, or perhaps having little sister wiki icons at bottom like they do over at Wikimedia beneath the independent Official friends. Maybe a little of both? graestan^(talk) 17:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • While it sounds like a good idea at first, I think leaving them as text links is perfectly acceptable given that I couldn't actually find an OFOW which used anything other than text to link to us. —NAYAYEN 01:18, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Random articlesEdit

• Lots of room for improvement. We have enough "click the text link" on the Main Page already without these. I had originally envisioned a slideshow of Good article intros or quotes with images where possible. The Good article intros would make for less space taken up than Featured intros usually demand. The argument at the time was that Good articles aren't as good as Featured articles and therefore don't deserve to be on the Main Page. I find this elitist and dated, especially because Good articles have basically become Featured articles of shorter length. graestan^(talk) 17:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Again, I think that there could be some improvement there. I think a slideshow would not be good here either, however. Thinking off the top of my head, perhaps a self-refreshing thing could be done with that there. Perhaps something like how the Recent Changes is set up. Users would have the option to have the "Random Articles" section self-refresh so that the user could just sit there and every couple of minutes (seconds?) it would change to display a different GA or FA article name.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 22:51, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • I like the idea of making it more graphical. It could operate much as it does now, only it would display an image from the article with the name underneath or something. ~Savage 15:48, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
• I think it's well past time we added "Random Comprehensive article" to the box. Menkooroo 02:34, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • ^Truth. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 07:27, March 14, 2012 (UTC)

In the newsEdit

• Also a great section already, by my book. graestan^(talk) 17:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • I don't know what anyone else thinksbut it seems that the news section is missing things that happen. I didn't see the airing of Revival in the news or (less majorly) Kotor 2 being released on Steam. Something that needs looking at. It was also be handy to have an archive page for the news like we have with every other section on the main page.--Commander Code-8 ^{To say hi, press 42} 09:20, October 4, 2012 (UTC)

Wookieepedia NewsnetEdit

• Just bring the dang thing back to life. Really. Volunteers would be most appreciated, I am sure. graestan^(talk) 17:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • I just want to echo the sentiment here. I think it's a great idea for the established users and the new users. It just needs someone who can keep it up to date and on track.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 22:51, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
    • And echoed again; this would be great for keeping current users interested in the community and the site, as well as pulling in new users. (I would love to help with the Newsnet myself, but as one of those users whose time is getting increasingly consumed by school, I barely have enough time to attempt to keep up with my current duties here as is.) Jonjedigrandmaster ^(Talk) 00:12, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
      • The last time I ever submitted something in our Newsnet was back in 2009, I believe. I could submit canon updates again. JangFett ^(Talk) 00:23, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
        • The Call of Duty wiki has a group of a few admins who release a news blog every Saturday/Sunday, containing not only news related to Call of Duty, but also the wiki. I think this could be something to consider. 1358 ^(Talk) 12:46, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
          • That might be good, but the main thing that I think the Wookieepeida Newsnet would be good for is the interviews and interaction with the users. If we're looking to show users that there are actually human people (or near-human anyway :P) working behind the usernames, then I think this would be one of the best ways to do it. I wouldn't mind helping out with it, but I'll admit that I'm a bit in the dark since the Newsnet kind of died out before I really got involved too much on the Wook.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 15:34, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
            • Interviews are the main thing that the Newsnet had. As for how to contribute, there's a WookieeProject and basically create an account on the newsnet site then ping me with the email you used to register and I can set you up so can post something. So you can interview a user and create a new post with an intro and the content of the interview. Then just ping me again (or a few others who have appropriate access such as Toprawa and Cavalier One) and I can publish it. :) Cheers, grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 15:40, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
• The Canon Updates that I started were also massively popular, with generally over 1,000 hits per entry. It takes a lot of time and commitment though, which is why I stopped about almost 6 months of almost weekly updates. --Eyrezer 21:06, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
• Another idea could be to allow for blog entries that offer commentary on Star Wars by established users. E.g., when researching an FA, I often find random occurrences/neat connections between disparate sources. It would be reasonably easy to write a "Random nuggets of Star Wars information" blog. --Eyrezer 21:14, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • I would be in favor of both of those suggestions, Eyerezer. Bella'Mia 09:05, February 7, 2012 (UTC)

On this day…Edit

• A good section, not really much that can be done as far as I am concerned. graestan^(talk) 17:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

Wookieepedian of the MonthEdit

• This should be more prominent than the very bottom corner, I think. Maybe a little blurb like they have at wikiHow on their "Meet a Community Member" sidebar item that appears on articles. It would promote the idea that accessible human beings are actually working on the site. graestan^(talk) 17:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • I don't know about the need to raise it up higher. However, some improvement here would be good. Perhaps putting the user's profile image (if they had one) along side the WotM announcement. Something similar to what was done with Wookieepedia NewsNet when they interviewed the WotM as can be seen here. They would place their profile image next to the interview. We could just place their user image down there in miniature.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 22:51, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
    • Tying this in to a desire to revive the NewsNet, maybe have the intro part of the NewsNet's WOTM interviews included here each month? —NAYAYEN 01:18, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
      • I really like that idea. "June's Wookieepedian of the month: Miguel Sanchez. Read an interview with him [[this is a link|here]]!" Menkooroo 04:16, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
      • ^Seconded. Bella'Mia 09:05, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
      • Excellent idea! ~Savage 15:52, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
      • I agree with interviewing each WotM as well as reviving the Newsnet in general. 1358 ^(Talk) 17:50, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
      • This could give us a face to the community as well, in that we're not all figments of text. :) -- Riffsyphon1024 21:25, March 7, 2012 (UTC)

Possible Future SectionsEdit

Featured imageEdit

• The argument most relied upon before was that this would put our Fair Use status on shaky ground. Well, it's pretty sad, really, because most other wikis of our type manage this without being sued or prosecuted, and LFL has very likely been using images lifted from this very site. At the very least this would be something people would come back to look at every day. graestan^(talk) 17:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Again, I've seen this on various wikis, and I've never like it. People can see images in the Featured article on the main page, or Good article if we start that. IMO, that's enough.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 22:51, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • There are plenty of cool images, but I don't see reason in having another nomination process to select the best ones. Whole sections of Star Wars media would be pretty-much left out of the running because, frankly, the drawing can be subpar. TCW comics comes to mind. Further, the majority of works are prose and since Star Wars's poplarity has dwindled in Japan, we've been getting less-than-spectacular covers lately. NaruHina ^Talk 00:08, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
• We can do this. Imagine the fair use arguments against image use like a big stone monolith. LFL themselves took a jackhammer to the monolith when they used our own original 3D renderings in the CSWE, then whittled them away further when they used them in the Databank, Starships and Vehicles Collection, and Wizards.com, and then the little pile of rubble that was left got NUKED when they linked to us in the new Encyclopedia and came right out and admitted they need us. I will still fight galleries to my last breath because they suck and are stupid, but a featured picture would be nice. -- Darth Culator ^(Talk) 00:20, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Nah, voting for a featured image seems rather pointless for us. JangFett ^(Talk) 00:22, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • I agree with Culator about being able to do this, but I always found the idea of a featured image to be kind of tacky. There's not much of a point... you can hit the random article button and get directed to any page with any number of images on it. You can find all kinds of images all over the site. Why shove one on the front page just to say "here's a picture of a thing that some people liked"? Unlike quotes, which aren't always easy to find and can be funny, poignant, or insightful, images are very simple to find on our site, with or without galleries. The whole idea always seemed too overtly gimmicky to me. Plus, we all already know what the first image will be... no surprises there. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 00:29, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
• I can't see how this could hurt. It's far more likely to generate interest than to drive users away because it is "tacky." I don't see this as being any harder to vote or maintain than the QOTD system. SinisterSamurai 04:19, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Tacky and gimmicky are not encyclopedic—and the image of encyclopedic professionalism is exactly the kind of image that we want to present on the main page. Usually I'm all for not taking Wookieepedia to seriously, but somewhere there has to be a line drawn between ideas that are fun and those that are pointless. And besides, I don't think we really need another arbitrary voting process. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 11:27, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
    • Per Trayus. Except I do believe that we should take Wookieepedia seriously to a point. We have a big responsibility, whether we want to admit it or not, to keep all Star Wars information up to date and have an excellent databank. Like Trayus, we don't really need another voting process either.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 16:50, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Well, I for one like the idea. If it were run like QOTD, there wouldn't be too much problem with it. It would be a good chance for us to showcase images that are really awesome but are perhaps not infobox-worthy (and thus likely to be stuck into an FA blurb). ~Savage 15:56, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Per Trayus—I don't see much point in this. 1358 ^(Talk) 17:48, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
    • I'm kinda on the fence on this one. I don't see it as "tacky," but I don't see it as being much of a help either. MasterFred^(Whatever) 19:25, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Couldn't we have a test phase of this to see how it works? If we're not satisfied with the results, we could always abandon it. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:45, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
  • I support this idea! Menkooroo 02:32, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
    • I would definetly support an FI section.--Commander Code-8 ^{To say hi, press 42} 09:20, October 4, 2012 (UTC)

LayoutEdit

I don't have much specific to suggest, only that a change in layout is desperately overdue. I realize that this is something that will probably have to be figured out after other changes have been made, but again I seek suggestions. graestan^(talk) 17:06, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

• A start on this could be variable-width columns, like what's seen at User:Master Jonathan/meh. This should work with the ads; the fanon wiki uses a similar setup on their Main Page (which is where I took the idea from). Thoughts? Master Jon (Jedi Council Chambers) Thursday, February 2, 2012, 17:01 UTC
  • I have to say that I don't really care for the example that you've provided right now. I don't think that widening the columns would help anything. It just makes it look out of place and leaves too much obvious spare room up at the top.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 01:27, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
    • Per Cal. JangFett ^(Talk) 01:48, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

PortalsEdit

• There was discussion some time about about introducing portals to the Main Page, with one idea being to link/promote WookieeProjects. I have done a little bit of work on an alternate WookieeProject:Aliens cover page, which uses randomised, linked images (that can be refreshed) to show off various featured articles. I took some of this coding from other wikis' Main Pages, and I think with some more creative thinking, something to this effect could be introduced to the Main Page. --Eyrezer 02:16, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • I really love this idea. It could also be a way to support the "featured topic" idea that has been proposed in the past—instead of having them on the main page, place them on the portal pages. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 04:30, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
    • It would really, really be useful as each of the episodes comes out in 3D. graestan^(talk) 04:43, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
      • This has my full support. Bella'Mia 09:05, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
        • Yeah, me too. How does the randomized image thing work, Eyre? That would be perfect for sprucing up the "Random articles" thing on the main page too. ~Savage 15:59, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
          • WookieeProject Entertainment and Culture also has a portal-esqye main page. I think the idea is great. MasterFred^(Whatever) 17:08, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
            • I support creating portals, provided someone maintains them. 1358 ^(Talk) 17:46, March 2, 2012 (UTC)

DiscussionEdit

I don't see any reason why we should reshuffle what's obviously working. And presumably if we were to change the cosmetic appearance of it, that would likely be part of a broader, site-wide revision. Sounds like an awful lot of make-work to me. -- DigiFluid 17:39, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

• It's not obviously working, it's obviously working less. In my introduction I mention that the site has long since peaked in terms of users editing per month. It is currently around 50% of that peak. New users, which are the lifeblood of a wiki, are fewer and further between than ever. Only a small percentage of new users become productive, regular users. Meanwhile, the established users are falling to attrition. College, life changes, indifference, being bored with Star Wars—these all contribute to the thinning of our ranks. graestan^(talk) 19:32, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • I've left comments for what I think about all this off the top of my head. I know that I've showed in the past that I've been against radical changes on Wookieepedia. Users can tell you that I'm a traditionalist, and I like to stick with what is working right now. However, I see some room for improvement on the Main Page, provided we don't forget our main focus: to deliver a complete, comprehensive, accurate collection of Star Wars information. Many, many Star Wars authors and other workers use Wookieepedia as their databank of information. StarWars.com links to us as the best source of Star Wars information on the web. I don't mind changes being made to improve the Main Page. I just plead that we do not forget what our main point is. We're not here to have the most substantial user base. It would be nice to have new users. However, we need new users who will work hard, stay dedicated, and become established, good users. We don't want to try and lower our standards just to get new users. Most times, when a new user comes here, if they intend on working hard and becoming a good established user, they won't really care what the Main Page looks like. To summarize, the Main Page could probably use some work, but please just don't forget why Wookieepedia is here.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 22:51, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

That hasn't got anything to do with page design. That's the nature of community-based websites. You see the exact same pattern on any given wiki, wikia, or message board. People come and people go, and new people come and new people go. There are peaks and valleys. That's not a crisis, that's just how community traffic is.

To be clear, I'll happily help out with any work if it's decided that this is going to happen. But until and unless that decision is reached, I still think this is a needless make-work project when there's already plenty to do what with some of the more notable recent releases (TOR, Darth Plagueis, Dawn of the Jedi, etc.) -- DigiFluid 17:08, February 2, 2012 (UTC)

It is worrying that editor count has sunk from the peak in August 2008 with 1,229 editors (users who made at least one edit in that month) down to 832 in January 2012. In August 2008 we had around 54,000 visitors on the site with over 1,100,000 pageviews. Yesterday, we had 108,955 visitors but only 968,959 pageviews. This means that people clearly use less time on the site—maybe a better Main Page with better article navigation could help? 1358 ^(Talk) 17:13, February 2, 2012 (UTC)

There's really any number of reasons for that--maybe it's just that the job market has turned to crap and everyone's too busy trying to find jobs or actually working at work instead of dicking around on Wikis (as I am currently doing lol) so that they don't have to go on the dole while it's still so hard to work. Or, perhaps more likely, maybe that peak has something to do with that August 2008 was when Star Wars was last in movie theaters, driving a ton more casual traffic our way and making numbers appear larger than they do on average. Not for nothing, more traffic is always a good thing. I just find it a bit disingenuous to look at numbers as the be-all end-all of our demographics, without looking to influencing factors. –DigiFluid 17:26, February 2, 2012 (UTC)

I agree with Digi on the aspect that the Main Page will not bring in good, quality editors. Like I said before, I think that good, quality, hard working users will not care what the Main Page looks like. They'll only care about how the Wiki looks on the "inside." Without trying to sound prideful or against new users, I think changes to the Main Page will not bring in new, quality users. Nor do I think that the look of the Main Page is the reason that we're losing good, quality users. Like Digi and others have said, many of the good, established users have left because of college and real-life activities. Most of the time, it had nothing to do with the way the Wook looked. The reason I would support any change to the Main Page is because it would be all right to have a good change. I just do not think that this is a way to "revitalize" the Wook. And, also like Digi said, our main concern with Wookieepedia should be working on the articles since so many people, official Star Wars workers included, depend on our work. Thus, our main focus should stay on that.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 01:52, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

• Just to note, there were a couple of ideas discussed in this earlier SH thread which may be good to expand on. —NAYAYEN 23:24, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
• While I don't think there's anything particularly wrong with the current layout and appearance, I'm always open to the possibility of improvement. One thing I would like to bring up is the rounded corners that are present throughout the site, as well as on the main page. While I don't hate them, I think that squaring everything off to be more in line with the war chronology templates would go a long way to improving our overall appearance of professionalism. For example, I think a template like {{Great Galactic War}} looks far more presentable than a template like {{K2char}} or {{History Sith}}. Culator brought up the issue in a no-consensus CT a while ago, but I think it's time to discuss it again. Rounded corners really are so 2005, and I think our main page (and the rest of the site) would really be improved by some regular ol' 90 degree angles. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 00:19, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Grae, I can't speak for you, but I know you've been pretty much inactive for a while. I think you coming back and starting this thread is a great thing, actually. I feel those of us who have been extremely active for a while have simply grown accustomed to the Main Page. Grae's view (as I see it, at least) more closely resembles that of most of the people visiting the site, and I give that view quite a bit of credit. We are here to serve the readers. Why else would we write articles? Sure our main focus should be writing, but it does no good if the readers can't find the articles or lose interest at first sight. MasterFred^(Whatever) 20:02, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
    • It's good to have new readers. However, as stated above, from my point of view our main purpose is to be the most comprehensive databank of Star Wars information. Our primary goal should be to have a great databank for Star Wars workers, and fans, to read. While it's nice to have new users and readers, I believe we should stay focused on what I believe to be our main focus.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 03:19, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
      • Getting new users isn't just nice; it's essential. We're a community, and besides which, new users means more comprehensive coverage. Menkooroo 17:01, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
        • True. But only if those new users prove to be good, hard working users.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 17:04, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
          • Did you turn out to be a good, hardworking user, Cal? (See the first 10 listings here) We can't tell who will flourish and who won't. We can fix what foolish nubs mess up, but any nub (unless they're unreasonable beyond reason, obviously) has the potential to do well on the site. Hell, I was banned twice myself, though I wouldn't say "flourish" is the word for me. And look at my username. NaruHina ^Talk 00:56, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
            • I'm not saying that we can tell who will and who won't be good users right off the bat, although it is sometimes obvious. What I'm saying, is that the Main Page does not bring in good users I do not believe. I did not join Wookieepedia and decide to edit here because of how it looked. To be honest, I didn't give a crap what the Wook looked like when I joined. I joined and started working here because I love Star Wars, and I truly wanted to work hard here. The work I did, then and now, has nothing to do with the way it looks. I think that making Wookieepedia look more "appealing" or "FaceBooky," so to say, will not bring in new users for the most part. I'm not against making Wookieepedia more user-friendly to an extent, but I don't think it determines whether people come or people go for the most part. However, whether changing the look will bring in better users or not is irrelevant to this conversation. This conversation is getting off-topic, so I'd suggest we get back to working on actually improving what we can.—Cal Jedi ^{(Personal Comm Channel)} 01:38, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
              • There's a lot of truth to that. I can really appreciate the ongoing effort to better ourselves, and there's never anything wrong with improvement. However, let's not fool ourselves either: Wikis are run by the dedicated, those who love a subject and whole-heartedly want to help their fan community. To use myself as an example, I first started out on the Wook when I came here looking for information and found several articles were severely wanting. I contribute so that when others come here looking for info, they get it, or so that when someone is looking to inform an uneducated party, they can confidently link to Wookieepedia for its comprehensive content, rather than going to Google for results that are oftentimes hit-or-miss. Pretty pictures and fancy trick links won't bring us good, solid editors. Maintaining our professional image, continuing to establish a friendly environment, and plain luck will bring in the people we're looking to attract. Bella'Mia 09:05, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
                • I personally DO judge a site by how it looks when I first visit it. If it looks outdated and unprofessional, then I assume its info is too. Coming from an artist's perspective, if something is not visually appealing, it does not get much respect from me. Revamping the main page will cater to those like me who are very much concerned about the look of things, but it won't take away from our main focus, which is making a comprehensive database. MasterFred^(Whatever) 17:18, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Can we bump this up? Or sticky it or something? Seems like it never went anywhere. Darth Trayus^{(Trayus Academy)} 06:48, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • I agree. This thread didn't really do much, but it's about a very important topic. I say make this a permanent thread or something. Keep it going! MasterFred^(Whatever) 15:01, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
    • Stickied. —MJ— ^{Jedi Council Chambers} Wednesday, March 7, 2012, 16:44 UTC
• With what Cal said. Our readership over the last seven years has changed. We used to just be for the fans, but as our database expanded, so did its readers, which now include various highers-up at LFL and their subsidiaries. Yes we should look professional. That is of no debate. But I can see the notion that simply a nice Main Page may not drive a person to edit. It's the articles that get the user to sign up, if they see something that can use improvement there. This of course works both ways, and you do want to make sure the first thing they see (assuming they don't link to an article directly) is the best material that we have to offer: our FAs and GAs. This may lead them into a much deeper understanding of the Star Wars universe than they ever knew before. I know that's happened to me several times upon checking in. -- Riffsyphon1024 08:31, March 15, 2012 (UTC)

• Just noticed this and was going to remind of the previous discussion we had in Forum:SH Archive/Revamp of the Main Page, good to notice Nayayen already did that. (: – Tm_T@Wookieepedia:~$ 16:23, July 8, 2012 (UTC)

Wikia layout revamp and Main Page woesEdit

Alright, as many of you have noticed, Wikia has revamped their layout in Oasis. Problem is it affects the Main Page in Monobook. The sidebar is pushed all the way down to the bottom. You can't click on any of the tabs, either. It's as if they're merely for show. This problem can no doubt be fixed by tweaking the Main Page coding, but hell if I know how to do so. So, until then... it's looking pretty shoddy. Trak Nar ^{Ramble on} 01:21, October 4, 2012 (UTC)

Temp fix in place here. Refresh your cache and should be fixed. Also, this is a known bug in monobook that should be fixed properly soon. Cheers, grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 01:41, October 4, 2012 (UTC)

Now fixed properly too which will be live on the wiki next week. Cheers, grunny@wookieepedia:~$ 02:15, October 4, 2012 (UTC)

Yay! Thank you! :D The weird bug of not being able to click on any of the tabs is still present, but I assume that it will be resolved next week. Trak Nar ^{Ramble on} 02:25, October 4, 2012 (UTC)