Forums > Senate Hall archive > SH Archive/Archetypes
  • Should or could we add archetypes as individual articles? I think we already have pilots and whatelse? I have a bunch of RPG pictures of individual archetypes and Pablo just publish an article on them... was just wondering if this was alright with everyone. --Razzy1319 07:29, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Sounds good to me. Some of them already have articles in Category:Occupations. Though if an archetype only exists in the context of a RPG and is never seen in any other canon source, then it should be noted as such in the BTS section. --Azizlight 07:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
    • Archetypes? So we're going to have a category for "Wise Old Man"? Let's see... Obi-Wan Kenobi, Yoda, Qu Rahn, Jolee Bindo, Kreia... haven't even touched the novels, and I'm sure they abound there.... -BaronGrackle 22:27, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
    • I tdon't think so. More occupations would be fine, but if we're to keep the concept of being an in-universe encyclopedia, archetypes aren't at all appropriate. jSarek 23:16, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.