Forums > Senate Hall archive > SH Archive/Canon Contredictions

I was thinking for Canon contredictions we could have it like we have certain parts of the KOTOR summery saying "Sources debate that" or "there is some confusion as to" and "some say ____ while others say ___" and "History has conflicted" you know what i mean Valin "Tnu" "Shido" Suul 08:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

  • I suppose it can't be any worse than not mentioning them at all...DarthMRN 23:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Sounds good to me. *cough*secondbattleofcoruscant*cough* Adamwankenobi 02:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Until retcons come out, this is the best solution; I did something like this regarding the number of turbolasers in the Death Star I article. Cutch 16:16, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
    • You could also attach a footnote and explain it at the bottom. —Xwing328(Talk) 21:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
  • but so we don't exclude the alternative in the other source we should do soemthing like this Valin "Tnu" "Shido" Suul 15:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Useful idea. A lot of wookieepedians seem to rely too much on some encyclopedia (which is supposed to be made by experts and be fairly accurate) rather than actual direct sources which contradict what the encyclopedia states. Things such as how hyperspace travel came into the Galaxy, and what is the homeworld of humanity, etc. Era-old Expansionary Fleet Commander Mitth'raw'nuruodo Discuss 16:09, 22 January 2007 (UTC)