FANDOM


Forums > Senate Hall archive > SH Archive/Exar (again) and Kyp as Sith Lords?


Should we add in Exar Kun and Kyp Durron as Dark Lords of the Sith for 11 ABY? Kyp did proclaim himself as such, and we have him listed on the DLOTS page... Thanos6 19:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Kyp yes, Exar no. Jasca Ducato Sith Council Sith Campaign 19:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Definitely no, for Exar Kun. He was dead, a disembodied spirit doesn't qualify. - JMAS 19:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
  • I would say yes for Kyp, dunno for Exar. Kuralyov 06:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
    • Technically Kyp was only able to claim the title based on the fact he was possessed by Kun. QuentinGeorge 06:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
      • Agreed. I say no for both. Kyp, on his own and without Kun, was not a Sith Lord. And as I stated above, a disembodied spirit of a long dead Sith Lord also doesn't qualify. - JMAS 13:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.