This page is an archive of a community-wide discussion. This page is no longer live. Further comments or questions on this topic should be made in a new Senate Hall page rather than here so that this page is preserved as a historic record. Toprawa and Ralltiir 20:43, November 16, 2010 (UTC)
Yesterday I realised that copypasting and filling some nest of html magic in order to get GA and FA boxes/slates/whaddyacallit is quite insane and far from easily manageable... so, I'm wondering if this kind of solution I have done here would be of any use with you others.
I'm also open for any suggestions for an improvement in that, it currently supports both GA and FA articles, don't know if CA support is even desirable.
Ramble! Rant! (: --Tm_T(Talk) 20:52, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
I talked about it a bit with you on IRC when you were making, I like it still. NAYAYEN 21:43, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
Personally, I don't like the "heading boxes" and the font in it. WP:TCW's good article list is better in my opinion. And for the record, that isn't so insane HTML magic. ;-) 1358(Talk) 12:32, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
Indeed the html parts are not insane (atleast for me or you), but copying it again and again and filling right places is IMO. I was actually surprised that there weren't any templates for this already (or is there?). And about styling: I'm not happy with it either, but haven't touched it yet as functionality first. (: --Tm_T(Talk) 13:10, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
As I didn't like the current heading boxes, I made a template of my own that can be used to display both versions. 1358(Talk) 14:11, October 18, 2010 (UTC)
Eventually I would like to see single uniform style used thorough the wiki, but until we're there, that works. (: --Tm_T(Talk) 14:27, October 18, 2010 (UTC)