FANDOM


Forums > Senate Hall archive > SH Archive/KOTOR I & II Articles: Legitimacy in the Galaxy?

With the popularity of the Knights of the Old Republic video game series, does the Star Wars Expanded Universe consider these to be actual histories in the Star Wars galaxy, or merely add-ons for the sake of gameplay?

The articles on Darth Revan, Darth Malak and the Exile seem to specific - and as we know they are indeed supported by LucasArts. Yet, with many chronologies - is there an official stand that these characters and situations exist in the far - distant past of the likes of Darth Vader and Darth Sidious? Unsigned comment by Mikda Fopal (talk • contribs).

  • Yes. 24.3.202.85 22:56, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes. No less canon than the books, comics or various guides. QuentinGeorge 06:24, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Yes, it's canon. However, only a select amount of choices are the canon history, as the individual articles say. Unsigned comment by Only one cannoli (talk • contribs).

Thanks for the comments. It appears that when it comes to legitimacy, anything that is 'sourced out' by LucasArts or its affiliations suddenly becomes canon. To me, especially with the events of The New Jedi Order and the New Republic (books and comic books), the storylines become contrived and very silly. The storylines in the KOTOR VG series are very good; I'm glad those are considered legit. User:Mikda Fopal

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.