Forum:SH Archive/New Rune Haako Image

Forums > Senate Hall archive > SH Archive/New Rune Haako Image

Well, this seems to be the newest craze, and I'm trying to get Rune to FA, so here goes.

Runerots234.jpg

The old image

The new image

Support

1. .... 23:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
2. --Eyrezer 06:55, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
3. Tinwe 13:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
4. Joker1138^(Mandalore)
5. RC-1187

Oppose

1. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 23:26, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
2. I need a name (Complain here) 18:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
3. Lorth Needa^Striptease 19:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
4. Angel BlueFile:Holocron negwt.jpg^(Holonet) 19:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
5. Redemption^Talk 23:20, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
6. --Rune Haako 00:49, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
7. --IG-Prime^{(Sentience Core)} 11:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Comments

The new image gives us a far better shot of his face, so, technically, it's more encyclopedic. .... 23:25, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

• The current one has much better quality. - Angel BlueFile:Holocron negwt.jpg^(Holonet) 19:22, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
• Like I said, give it sometime and I'll try to have a ROTS portrait (though there some difficulties in obtaining one through my normal means due to factors beyond my control at this moment). --Redemption^Talk 23:20, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Any chance of a TPM portrait? .... 00:52, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Slim chance that I'd just go with the TPM portrait. --Redemption^Talk 04:43, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
      • No, I mean can you find a good quality TPM portrait? .... 06:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
        • Oh definitely. Same exact place. --Redemption^Talk 18:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
          • Well, uh....do you think it would be suitable for the infobox? .... 23:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
            • Very...if it were his latest appearance. --Redemption^Talk 01:58, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
              • We don't care about the latest appearance thing anymore. .... 02:15, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
                • "You" does not equal "we". --Redemption^Talk 02:20, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
                  • 7 to 2 equals we. Anyway, can I see the TPM portrait at least? .... 02:21, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
                    • 7 to 2 say that there shouldn't be a policy, not that it should be most memorable. Heres the TPM image. [1] --Redemption^Talk 02:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Oh. My. God. That image is perfect! .... 04:02, 26 October 2006 (UTC)