Forums > Senate Hall archive > SH Archive/Quinlan Vos edit

According to the article's history, a lot of information was removed in an edit under my username. I never personally edited the article. Does this mean someone figured out my password.--Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 01:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Are you referring to this edit? Because that was you. Does anyone else have access to your computer? —Silly Dan (talk) 01:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
    • I know it says it was me, and no one else had access to my computer, but as far as I know, I didn't do that. If it really was me, it wasn't something I intended, and I can only explain it as some bizzare accident. If that is the case, I am deeply sorry. I wish I knew what happened, but I don't. I'm worried someone could vandalize under my name. I don't want to be blocked for something I didn't do.--Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 01:46, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
      • Even if it was you, it seemed to be minor enough to only be worth a warning. Which in this case, turned out to actually be a warning to change your password or something... 8) —Silly Dan (talk) 02:59, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
        • Wasn't all that minor, just look at the change. It looks like someone meticulously went over the article and changed certain things here and there along with removing a huge section of the article. And it was obviously someone familiar with wiki-sourcing, as they changed a link to Dark side of the Force to The Force/Legends#The dark side: Sith philosophy and then marked the whole thing as a minor edit. I don't know about you, but there's no way I could have pulled that off as a newbie without being somewhat familiar with wiki-code. This isn't an ordinary vandal in my opinion. Darth Oblivion, do you know someone close to you that is familiar with working on a wiki? Cull Tremayne 06:14, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
          • IIRC, you were reverting the edits of an anon vandal at the time. It's more than likely you clicked to edit the previous version of the article that they hadn't changed and didn't notice the date on it. -- I need a name (Complain here) 17:13, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
            • Ok, that makes perfect sense. I remember an earlier version of the article was missing the section that was removed. Since the likelihood of a vandal going over the entire article and making minor changes is unlikely. Cull Tremayne 17:23, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
              • Thanks for clearing that up. Everyone makes mistakes. I still don't remember doing it, though. Anyway, sorry for making you have to fix the article Tremayne.--Lord OblivionSith holocronSith Emblem 03:29, 13 October 2006 (UTC)