Forums > Senate Hall archive > User-made logos

Say there's an organization, a structure or a company with an emblem that's never shown on more than 4 pixels, if a user draws it big and clear, how must he classify that image in terms of source and license?--Jinger 21:35, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

  • He can't. No matter how good it is, it's fanon. Sometimes it doesn't make much sense, but that's policy. Chack Jadson 21:38, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Actually, it seems the vote on that came up as no consensus. jSarek 01:55, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
      • Should the source of the original go as the source of the drawing as well? I guess so, but I'm not quite sure.--Jinger 03:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
        • In legal terms, it would probably be a derivative work, a creation of someone new based on preexisting copyrighted material. Wildyoda 04:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
          • Whether or not we allow the picture, both the original source and the fact that it is fan-edited need to be documented. —Xwing328(Talk) 23:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Ad blocker interference detected!

Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.