I believe it has just been confirmed that 2-1B was indeed present and operated upon Vader's charred remains just after his duel with Kenobi. I think this should be included in the article. Jasca Ducato 15:10, 12 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• Do we have a source stating that they were the same droid? jSarek 08:27, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• I don't think it's the same droid, actually. I'm not even convinced its the same model QuentinGeorge 08:40, 19 Sep 2005 (UTC)
  • The Databank entry for the Emperor Palpatine Surgical Reconstruction Center says that [1] "A team of medical droids, including 2-1B, FX-6 and Galactic Chopper units, treated Vader's injuries", but the databank entry for 2-1B [2] doesn't say anything about an Ep. III appearance. This could be taken as meaning a different droid of the same model was present. — Silly Dan 22:08, 19 Sep 2005 (EDT)
    • I figured it was the same droid based on it being listed in the Episode III appearances category [3], and that they simply haven't gotten around to updating it. MarcK 22:41, 19 Sep 2005 (EDT)
      • 2-1B is a code unique to the droid. Such as C-3PO is unqiue to C-3PO. 3PO is a Protocal Droid, 2-1B is a medical droid. So if it says 2-1B worked on Vader, it means the actual droid, not one of a chain! PS The Databanks on starwars.com aren't always updated properly (explaining the missing ep.III appearances entry) Jasca Ducato 17:29, 20 Sep 2005 (UTC)
    • This is a typical LFL gaff. 2-1B has been treated as both a designation for a droid type and as the character described in the article. --SparqMan 18:14, 20 Sep 2005 (EDT)
      • Exactly. So referring to a "2-1B . . . unit," as the databank does, implies it's any random 2-1B, rather than the specific one we know from ESB. jSarek 18:30, 20 Sep 2005 (EDT)
        • To add more confusion to the matter, here's the quote from the latest Sith Snapshot:

"The familiar looking medical droid that treats a badly injured Darth Vader. This droid was intended to be the same model as the 2-1B seen in Empire, but not the exact same droid."TIEPilot051999 21:40, 23 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• Link for the above comment. This pretty much confirms it isn't the exact same droid. QuentinGeorge 05:04, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • OK, this was the sense I got from Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader, too. I guess we need to rework the article a bit, then, to reflect a model line instead of one particular droid. WhiteBoy 08:01, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Non-Medical DutiesEdit

The fact that the 2-1B on Hoth had a conversation with Luke about what equipment to leave behind in the evactuation, with no one else present, seems to imply that the Rebels were using it for other functions in addition to being a doctor. 68.47.234.131 02:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

• Knowing the Rebellion, 2-1B was probably also programmed with tactics prrograms to save money. Crowe 13:45, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

66.232.72.35 02:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)Do you have a source for that or are you just pulling shit out of your ass? No ORIGINAL RESEARCH, you stupid fucking piece of shit.

• Calm down. It's only a problem if he starts adding it into articles with no sources to back it up. -- I need a name (Complain here) 13:08, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I believe that the anon is to be banned? He used extremely offensive language against another user. 18:50, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

who destroyed this page? Edit

• who the hell removed this page's appearances, sources, and notes/ref's sections? Toprawa and Ralltiir 22:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Fixed. -- I need a name (Complain here) 13:42, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Clone Wars? Edit

Was this 2-1B the one in the Destroy Malevolence episode, or was that another one? ~ Dr.Kermit 03:32, 5 October 2008 (UTC)