Identical?Edit

is this identical, btw, to any vehicles seen in Force Commander, Galactic Battlegrounds, or Empire At Wat?

and Why anti-aircraft, in the games it seemed anti-vehicle/anti-personnel?JustinGann 17:51, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• Well, that's what official sources say. Admiral J. Nebulax 19:41, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • I wasn't disputing that it was canon, just curious as to the jkustification of the name.JustinGann 22:26, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)
    • I apologize; I didn't mean my response to sound like you were disputing that it was canon. Admiral J. Nebulax 23:03, 27 Nov 2005 (UTC)

PictureEdit

Could someone find a picture for this article? Preferably one that shows the whole vehicle. :) VT-16 13:41, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• I'll see what I can do. Admiral J. Nebulax 20:40, 20 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rename?Edit

Since there are not many sources that state the name being the Anti Aircraft Combat Hovertank. I think the real name is Alliance Assault Craft Unit 1Kalas Grengar 05:21, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

It's already called the Alliance AAC-1, so Alliance Alliance Assault Craft would be repetitive.

• Well, calling it the "Alliance AAC-1" isn't exactly wrong, because you wouldn't say "Alliance AC-1". —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 12:09, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

That's why AAC-1 would stand for Alliance Assault Craft.