Wookieepedia

READ MORE

Wookieepedia
Register
Advertisement
Wookieepedia
Wiki-shrinkable

This is the talk page for the article "A Princess on Lothal."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Rebels-logo-big

A Princess on Lothal is within the scope of WookieeProject: Rebels, an effort to develop comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating in or related to the Star Wars Rebels TV series.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice or visit our project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the discussion.

Hammerhead Cruiser[]

Has it been confirmed that these are Hammerhead Cruisers in the teaser? If so, shouldn't there be a canon page? 137.155.238.78 17:17, January 12, 2016 (UTC)

  • We'll probably have more information after the episode airs and an episode guide goes up on StarWars.com to do this. VDO talk 17:19, January 12, 2016 (UTC)
    • By this point though, do you think they would still be considered Hammerheads, because it was a very common designin in the old Republic, because there were also Thranta-class corvettes as well. 137.155.238.78 17:26, January 12, 2016 (UTC)
      • We'll find out soon enough, I think, and we'll be able to name the new page properly then. To me it looks like it will be a Hammerhead, but it's pointless to speculate since they could go with a completely new name or not name the class at all (at least not yet). VDO talk 17:31, January 12, 2016 (UTC)
      • Yeah, I agree with User:VDO. However Ezra called them "Old Transports", so they may not canonically be warships, unless, of course, they were converted into transports or Ezra doesn't know what the heck he's talking about. Darth Ravigious (talk) 18:36, January 12, 2016 (UTC)

Leia's age[]

Although the maths suggest that Leia is 16 during the episode, this post of the official Rebels Facebook account states that she is fifteen. --LelalMekha (talk) 21:05, January 22, 2016 (UTC)

Rise of Skywalker Visual Dictionary[]

Just to be clear: the date of 36 years before The Force Awakens/2 BBY in Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker: The Visual Dictionary for the Mission on Lothal contradicts previously established facts from several difference sources:

  • That the episode is set 3 years before A New Hope, as stated here on StarWars.com when the episode first aired and that she is 16 in the episode, as stated in Star Wars: Absolutely Everything You Need to Know, Updated and Expanded.
  • That Ahsoka is 32 years old when she faces Darth Vader in "Twilight of the Apprentice," also stated in Absolutely Everything You Need to Know, Updated and Expanded, which would be mathematically impossible if that episode (much less one 10 episodes before it!) were set in 2 BBY, given that she was fourteen upon first becoming Anakin's apprentice (22 BBY, as stated in Star Wars: Galactic Atlas).
  • That Phoenix Cell relocated to Chopper Base in "The Mystery of Chopper Base" "three years before the Battle of Yavin," as stated in Dawn of Rebellion.
  • Not to mention the idea of nearly 30 episodes of Star Wars Rebels being set in 2 BBY, but only 3 (at most!) being set in 3 BBY is ridiculous, makes no sense and would suggest nearly an entire year being glossed over in the Rebels timeline.
  • Plus there is a 6 month timeskip (see slide 6) between "Twilight of the Apprentice" and Star Wars Rebels: Steps Into Shadow, that would somehow need to fit into the timeline as well.

Everything we already know about the timeline of Rebels in season 2 indicates the year given in that timeline is simply not accurate . Toqgers (talk) 11:06, December 26, 2019 (UTC)

Advertisement