Talk:Abel G. Peña
From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.
[edit] Controversial comments?
What was it that he said, exactly, about Wookieepedia that got him in trouble with LFL? Adamwankenobi 05:14, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I believe it was just his acknowledgement of us after the 1 year anniversary. .... 06:46, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- What a bunch of spoiled sports. Adamwankenobi 06:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Is Wookieepedia not liked by LFL? --School of Thrawn 101 06:49, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Where is this coming from? CooperTFN 07:00, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- It's not a matter of liking or not liking. I just think LFL probably has reservations with its writers acknowledge fan projects that may be seen as borderline in a licensing-sense. (eg, why buy guides when you can read info for free, etc...) Doesn't mean he's currently in a LFL-"Reeducation" center or anything. Chill. QuentinGeorge 07:04, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, at what point has anyone insinuated that he's in an LFL-"Reeducation" center? That's a fairly drastic leap, imo. --School of Thrawn 101 07:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- What are you guys talking about? Who said he was in trouble? CooperTFN 07:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Adamwankenobi --School of Thrawn 101 07:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm with Coops here... can someone tell us exactly what the shit is going on? When and how did Abel get into trouble? --Azizlight 08:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't mean it in a literal sense. Adamwankenobi 11:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok... so the conversation above is essentially about nothing then? --Azizlight 12:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Right. I was only asking what remark of his got (let's try this again) "raised eyebrows" from LFL. Adamwankenobi 19:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- But that still seems to indicate you've heard something suggesting that something he said got raised eyebrows, which is what Aziz and I are confused about. The only other thing I can think of is that you're asking whether LFL was displeased with what he's said about this site in the past, in which case you're phrasing it horribly. =p CooperTFN 19:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- My query was inspired by a comment of (IIRC) User:Ozzel's I read in the transcript of the last Mofference. Adamwankenobi 20:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm pretty sure it was from a post at TFN. I'll see if I can dig it up. -- Ozzel 20:38, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- My query was inspired by a comment of (IIRC) User:Ozzel's I read in the transcript of the last Mofference. Adamwankenobi 20:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- But that still seems to indicate you've heard something suggesting that something he said got raised eyebrows, which is what Aziz and I are confused about. The only other thing I can think of is that you're asking whether LFL was displeased with what he's said about this site in the past, in which case you're phrasing it horribly. =p CooperTFN 19:53, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Right. I was only asking what remark of his got (let's try this again) "raised eyebrows" from LFL. Adamwankenobi 19:16, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- Ok... so the conversation above is essentially about nothing then? --Azizlight 12:03, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I didn't mean it in a literal sense. Adamwankenobi 11:56, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- What are you guys talking about? Who said he was in trouble? CooperTFN 07:19, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, at what point has anyone insinuated that he's in an LFL-"Reeducation" center? That's a fairly drastic leap, imo. --School of Thrawn 101 07:17, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
- We can't speculate on these types of things, provide proof or the matter is a rumor. -- Riffsyphon1024 04:06, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- That's exactly why I started this thread—wishing to know the validity of some hearsay. Adamwankenobi 04:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well for the record, it was not I who said it. ;-) -- Ozzel 04:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry, my mistake. Adamwankenobi 04:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Well for the record, it was not I who said it. ;-) -- Ozzel 04:20, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- That's exactly why I started this thread—wishing to know the validity of some hearsay. Adamwankenobi 04:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Archived?
Is there any reason why this page was archived? It wasn't very long at all. --Azizlight 06:04, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
- Off-topic conversations. - Sikon 06:09, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Full name
In case you've ever wondered what the G. stood for, it is Gustavo, as in Abel Gustavo Lopez Peña IV. His full name is given in a Myspace blog he posted on February 3, 2006. [1] Should his full name be given within the article, keeping the title the same, or should we leave it alone? -- Riffsyphon1024 18:52, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
