Talk:Aeten II
Back to page
Appearances
Edit
Is it appearing in Rebel Assault II?? MoffRebus 20:06, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
The Status of Aeten II in Empire at WarEdit
I think the appearance of Aeten II in Empire at War is perfectly canon, going by what WP:Canon says. It's in a LucasArts computer game and nothing else conflicts with it's presence in other canon. The planet is not destroyed until after the Battle of Yavin, and it does not even appear in the Forces of Corruption story campaign. So why the non-canon disclaimer? Pelmarn Da'kari 09:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Does it appear in the campaign? Because if it does it's indeed canon. If it only appears in the Galactic Conquest mode of the game, then I'm not sure if it's canon. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 12:14, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think his point is that the wording, as it stands now, is perfectly within the realm of establishing Aeten II's appearance in the game as canon. I can't remember if it's in the story campaign off the top of my head, but that doesn't mean much. Basically, we need to fire up EaW and check for Aeten II. --School of Thrawn 101 20:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- It appears in the story campaign of Eaw, but not Forces of Corruption, which is perfectly fine since it was destroyed sometime between the Battle of Yavin and the Battle of Endor. The story campaign of vanilla EaW takes place before the Battle of Yavin, so it's appearance is both canon and non-conflicting with any other canon, especially considering that no major missions occur there...it's just sort of "there." So even though it's appearance in the story campaign is almost irrelevant, there is nothing about it being there that conflicts with anything else. Get what I'm saying? That's why I think the non-canon disclaimer should be removed. Pelmarn Da'kari 23:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- It appeared in the (canon) story campaign of EaW which is noted in appearances. And, like you said, it's not in the campaign of Forces of Corruption. So FoC should not be listed as an Appearance. And I agree, the Behind the scenes info should be removed. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 23:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Alright then, I'm going to change the article accordingly. Pelmarn Da'kari 23:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- Behold the power of effective communication! --64.194.103.95 01:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)(Mine! --School of Thrawn 101 01:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC))
- Alright then, I'm going to change the article accordingly. Pelmarn Da'kari 23:59, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- It appeared in the (canon) story campaign of EaW which is noted in appearances. And, like you said, it's not in the campaign of Forces of Corruption. So FoC should not be listed as an Appearance. And I agree, the Behind the scenes info should be removed. --Jedimca0(Do or Do Not, There is No Try) 23:35, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- It appears in the story campaign of Eaw, but not Forces of Corruption, which is perfectly fine since it was destroyed sometime between the Battle of Yavin and the Battle of Endor. The story campaign of vanilla EaW takes place before the Battle of Yavin, so it's appearance is both canon and non-conflicting with any other canon, especially considering that no major missions occur there...it's just sort of "there." So even though it's appearance in the story campaign is almost irrelevant, there is nothing about it being there that conflicts with anything else. Get what I'm saying? That's why I think the non-canon disclaimer should be removed. Pelmarn Da'kari 23:17, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think his point is that the wording, as it stands now, is perfectly within the realm of establishing Aeten II's appearance in the game as canon. I can't remember if it's in the story campaign off the top of my head, but that doesn't mean much. Basically, we need to fire up EaW and check for Aeten II. --School of Thrawn 101 20:30, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
ChronologyEdit
How it was discovered in 1000 BBY if, during the Cold War, it's representative was Diab Duin? There something wrong with the Chronology, and ,althrough the Biographies section in The Old Republic site doesn't mention a exact year, it was discovered before the Treaty of Coruscant.Te Shukalaryc Mand'alor
02:39, October 23, 2010 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
