Talk: All Terrain Ion Cannon

This is the talk page for the article "All Terrain Ion Cannon."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

All Terrain Ion Cannon has been listed as a Good article; it adheres to certain quality standards. If you can expand it or improve it further, please do so!

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 10, 2010	Good article nomination	Success
May 18, 2010	Good article by Toprawa and Ralltiir

Current status: Good article

IU appearance[]

Has this AT-IC ever appeared in an IU source? Or given any IU background? --SparqMan 12:47, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

There's your reference, the NEGTWT--Eion 15:52, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Stats[]

Is there anything bigger than an at-ic? its bigger than an at-at by 0.5 meters right? the force.net says there are ultra heavy walkers bigger than an at-at but doesnt really say what model or have any pics. posted by xyx_alone

Where do those stats come from anyway? I don't recall the NEGWT going into that much depth - Kwenn 09:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- They could be based off the AT-AT. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 11:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
- What else does the book say about the AT-IC? It'd be good to get more info on this thing. VT-16 10:38, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  - TNEGTVaV? Nothing. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 14:50, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Alternate appearance[]

I've seen pictures online with what looks like an AT-AT with a V-150 anti-orbital ion cannon for a head. Is this an imaginary model, or another variant of AT-AT? --Wolf of Thor 05:40, December 9, 2011 (UTC)

Picture[]

I understand that the Hasbro prototype was rejected by Lucasfilm, but nothing in that picture jibes with what we know. What Wookieepedia rule prevents us from putting it in the infobox? In comparison, on Wikipedia images that may or may not look like the subject are allowed in the infobox. For example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miguel_de_Cervantes. CloneMarshalCommanderCody (talk) 21:55, July 4, 2014 (UTC)

The AT-IC was never released, therefore the image isn't "canon", and as such cannot be placed in the infobox. Additionally, we are not Wikipedia. Supreme Emperor (talk) 03:34, July 5, 2014 (UTC)