Contents 1 Rebel Use 2 picture 3 Something else to note. 4 Light Armour? 5 Is it in galaxies 6 Get ht car picture off -_-

Rebel UseEdit

"The Galactic Empire still utilized a limited number of these walkers, as did the Rebel Alliance." While this statement might be technically true, I don't think it's correct to identify this as both an Imperial and Rebel vehicle. As far as I know, AT-PTs weren't a common sight in Rebel armies, and any of these they might have had were stolen from the Empire. AT-PTs are as Rebel as TIE fighters. JimRaynor55 20:40, 7 Sep 2005 (UTC)

• So was the Nebulon-B frigates, the Lambda-class shuttles, the Sentinel-class transports, the Bulk Cruisers and many of the Action VI transports. Not to mention AT-APs being used by the Rebels in Empire at War. And the AT-PTs have been featured only as Imperial vehicles for a long time now. Strange, for a supposedly "rare" walker. ;P VT-16 12:14, 8 Sep 2005 (UTC)
• AT-APs are used by pirates in Empire at War, not Rebels. However if either the Rebels or Imperials capture or build abandoned factories, they could produce AT-APs. The Rebels stole 3 AT-PTs from Fest in Star Wars: Rogue Squadron, but throughout the course if the series, you destroy many more Imperial-controlled ones. Tony Knightcrawer 01:07, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

picture Edit

We need a better picture.--General Antilles 23:57, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Something else to note. Edit

When Han Solo encountered them aboard the Katana fleet, he had no idea what AT-PT's were. Neither did anyone else. This kinda seems to come into conflict with the video game . . . Just thought I'd toss that in. It'd be nice to see it treated.

• In the Thrawn Trilogy? --School of Thrawn 101 07:51, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Ok, nevermind...I just remembered them. --School of Thrawn 101 07:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
• Yeah, the Thrawn Trilogy - "Just remembered them" is rather cryptic . . .

Light Armour? Edit

I'm sure that there are differing specs on this, but didn't the Essential Guide imply that they had heavier armour? Something that made them a lot tougher than AT-ST's? Memory's kind of foggy . . .

• I doubt it. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision) (Record of Imperial Service)} 20:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
  • The command pod is heavily armored, giving the driver outstanding protection... ...When sealed, the craft is virtually impenetrable by small-arms fire. (Essential Guide to Vehicles and Vessels) Myself, I think it is relative. Karohalva 21:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
    • Can't the same thing be said about an AT-ST's cockpit, though? —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision) (Record of Imperial Service)} 23:32, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Is it in galaxies Edit

If it is in galaxies Please send me somthing about how to get one as i relaly like the looks of it or please send me a link to the site of galaxies Venator- Heavy Enforcer 18:58, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Get ht car picture off -_- Edit

Get it off...it's not an AT-PT. And if you're doing that for the fanon thing, it's an APRIL FOOLS JOKE. And I think I am the only one who gets that... --Lamp774 10:57, April 1, 2012 (UTC)Lamp774

• It's a PT cruiser, this is the AT-PT page. I don't see the problem. nayayen★talk 11:00, April 1, 2012 (UTC)