Better images Edit

Can someone give this article a better image, one with a full view of the station? There should also be full-view images of all the different levels of an Alliance Space Station. Possibly putting a gallery of all the different levels. Cyfiero 03:25, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

• A better image is easy to get, but this article is just so, well, obscure, I have better things to do than add an image to a stub about a station that was created just for game mechanics (like adding the stub template to this article).Nebulon B freak 18:43, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
  • but the article can be expanded, along with the Consortium station. The Imperial station has its own sub-class articles, and it is easy to get the specs (like the hardpoints). I think we should expand this.--Governor Jerjerrod 21:15, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
    • The article can be expanded (and if you'd like to expand it, that would be great), but it'll be harder to do than with the Cardan-class space station, because for the Cardan we had this source: http://wizards.com/default.asp?x=starwars/article/Mesop2 which we don't have for the Alliance space station (or the Consortium space station, for that matter). We can't really use the hardpoints as a definitive source for what weaponry it has, either, since that's a game mechanic which is designed for game play balance rather than accuracy (as can be seen with the number and type of hardpoints found on the cap ships in the game). Doluk^{Furthermore I believe that lists must be destroyed.} 17:35, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Canonicity Edit

Would it not be appropriate to add a "Behind the Scenes" section addressing the fact that these stations are dubiously canon gameplay devices (at least in their manifestation in the game; not that they don't exist in canon, but that they aren't built above every liberated world). . . Adamjames 18:24, June 28, 2010 (UTC)