Talk:Ambria

From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.

Contents 1 Dark Apprentice 2 Rule of Two 3 Padawan 4 Ambria in Stenness System?

[edit] Dark Apprentice

This article currently lists Dark Apprentice as an appearance. Yet a text search of Ambria and many related terms reveals nothing. And it is not listed on the book's article. I would've removed it except CUSWE has it a source also. So, could someone confirm/deny this? Does Ambria, or a planet which could be Ambria, appear in Dark Apprentice. If no-one answers within a day or so I'm removing it. -- AdmirableAckbar ^[Talk] 22:19, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rule of Two

In case you haven't read DB:RoT, Admirable, Bane and Zannah have beem living on Ambria for at least some time by the second part of the book(990 BBY.DiScOrD tHe LuNaTiC 14:38, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

• Oh crap, I just remembered that I haven't finished this yet. Thanks for the info DiScOrD. -- AdmirableAckbar ^(Talk) 03:34, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Padawan

Hey akbar, Be careful on the use of the word Padawan. There is no indication in any recognized source (to my knowledge) that jedi apprentices were called padawans during the time of Tales of the Jedi. As such, Nomi et al. were Thon's apprentices, not padawans. This is especially important because Padawan, so far, has indicated a one on one relationship of master and student. I didn't change it because of your headers. Hopefully you do. good luck with your revision.

• While they aren't referred to as such in TotJ, I recall (although admittedly I can't remember exactly where) TotJ-era apprentices referred to as Padawans in at least one source -- probably the Power of the Jedi Sourcebook. I generally only use it for a bit of variety, though I should look into more and check up on the sources when I have time. -- AdmirableAckbar ^(Talk) 22:06, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Ambria in Stenness System?

Hi there, I'm reading Darth Bane: Path of Destruction. At the beginning of Chapter 25 it states that Ambria is in the Stenness System. Is this also a mistake similar to the 'power of the Jedi Sourcebook' ? Can anyone clarify? Romizzi 18:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)