Wikia

Wookieepedia

Watchlist Recent changes

Talk:Antarian Rangers

Back to page

Wiki-shrinkable.png

This is the talk page for the article "Antarian Rangers."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Contents

FoundingEdit

Were the Antarian Rangers founded in 620 BBY or 500 BBY? Jaywin 19:25, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Hero's Guide has it as 600 years before the Clone Wars, don't know where the 500 figure is from -Dangerdan97 12:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Battlefront II Edit

Who thinks that these guys are the soldiers you had to fight in Battlefront II in the Jedi temple level? Unsigned comment by 89.27.200.151 (talk • contribs).

Behind the scenes Edit

The article mentions that Antarian Rangers are similar in name and function as the Aquilian Rangers, based on The Making of Star Wars: The Definitive Story Behind the Original Film is this an interpretation of the source or a quotation? If it is a quotation, would it be possible to have it in full on this page (no need to edit the article)? Thank you.Tarnpagott 00:13, February 23, 2010 (UTC)Tarnpagott

HistoryEdit

This sentence doesn't make a lot of sense: "although New Republic politicians showed concern for another independent, paramilitary group aside from the new Jedi." Either "although" needs to change to, say, "and", or it should say "showed little concern." I don't think I have the source for this info, though, so I can't say which it should be. Help? Jenosidanian 13:25, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

  • Actually, no. The sentence as it stands is fine. It indicates the NR was concerned with the Rangers' growth, in spite of said growth which would normally be intuited as a desirable situation given the Rangers' history. Dangerdan97 17:45, September 5, 2010 (UTC)
    • Ah, I see what you're saying. I still think we have a connotation problem, though: the phrase "showed concern for" is generally, I think, a positive one, i.e. that the Republic was interested in, cared about, and encouraged their growth. If, however, this is intended to be negative, then perhaps a word like "worry" would be more clear. "New Republic politicians were worried about the growth of another..."? Do you think that'd do the trick? Jenosidanian 18:26, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Pages on Wookieepedia

Add a Page
93,463pages on
this wiki

Latest Photos

Add an Image
49,833images on this wiki
See more >

Recent Wiki Activity

See more >

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki