This is the talk page for the article "B2-RP battle droid." This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

"This point forward, we are entering uncharted territory." B2-RP battle droid is within the scope of WookieeProject: The Clone Wars, an effort to develop comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating in or related to the Star Wars: The Clone Wars television series. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice or visit our project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Why was it separated from the Jump droid? The are clearly the same design. Mauser 12:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

• As I tried to discuss in the Jump droid page, they are not the same design. The thrusters are remarkably different, one being a jet pack and the other a rocket pack. Plus, their official names are different. The official site specifically refer to the Jedi Crash droids as "Rocket droids"Gry Sarth 12:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Main Picture Edit

I don't think the main picture should have been changed. Although this one is cool, it fails to really portray the two characteristics of the Rocket droid: their different paint job and the thrusters on their back. The previous image clearly showed both. Anybody objects to me changing it? 82.45.192.117 10:57, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

• I agree, the image does show characteristics. But the quality of the image is far inferior. You can see the jets on the droid via the secondary image in the article. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 16:39, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
  • What do you mean the quality is inferior? It has over twice the resolution of the current image! If you don't think the main image needs to show the jets, then maybe the pic could be cropped to show only the front-facing droid in greater detail. What do you think? I just insist that the unique paint scheme is too relevant to be ignored in the main picture. Gry Sarth 16:47, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
    • Twice the width/height in size does not mean higher resolution. The edges on the one you uploaded looked rough and not very clear and crisp. Also, it is generally preferred that the infobox image center and focus on the subject. The one you just uploaded does work better because it centers on the subject, so that would would be good for the infobox, I think. - JMAS ^{Hey, it's me!} 16:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

ARTWORK Edit

Can someone get artwork for da rocket droid!?!?70.138.14.6 20:13, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

• I'm not sure, really, what that would add to the article; it's reasonably small, and there's already two images. Of course, if you have the visual guide or something, you're welcome to scan and upload an image. :) --Darth tom (Imperial Intelligence) 20:15, 16 May 2009 (UTC)