This article is made of win. 8D VT-16 20:10, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

• Did you notice that the image keeps disappearing?--Lord Oblivion^{Sith holocron} 20:33, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  • All images are doing that. It's Wikia's fault. -- I need a name (Complain here) 20:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Refference Edit

Ok, this thing looks wierd: W-I-E-R-D wierd. Is it possible its supposed to be a cultural refference--75.84.148.90 04:42, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Enough evidence that this is a species?Edit

From what I can see, this article (and the species of Max) are based on this single quote:
"He's a bunny, I'm a dog. We're dangerous, but we work cheap."
I'm an inclusionist, but I'm not sure this is sufficient to declare it a Star Wars species, based on:

1. It is from a game strategy guide. What is the context of this quotation? Is it a story narration describing in-universe events, or is it a chapter introduction to non-universe game explanations? I'd say that Peña's use of "lagomorph" can be canon because it's described in-universe (even though it's taken from a famous Max quote); is "bunny" ever used in-universe?
2. It's a quote from Sam, who does not exist in the Star Wars universe. If this quotation is from an out-of-universe context in the strategy guide, then there is no evidence that anyone in Star Wars would describe "bunny" as a species.
3. Even if all of the above were in-universe and canon, consider: This is an actual quote that predates its inclusion in the strategy guide. When Sam said this quote (in OUR universe) "bunny" was meant as a synonym for "rabbit". Is there any indication that, here, Sam's use of "bunny" means a separate species than rabbit?

If there is agreement, I'd suggest turning this page into a merge for rabbit, with the Max page going back to "Max (lagomorph)". -BaronGrackle 05:11, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

You know, I just realized this was the "Unknown lagomorph species" article. I'd support renaming it that. -BaronGrackle 06:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

• Well we already have rabbit. -- Riffsyphon1024 06:31, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  • I agree with BaronGrackle on this one. The kind of standards we normally work would require Bunny to be capitalised to be considered a species name. An example of this is our treatment of the Glurrgs. --Eyrezer 06:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
  • I disagree. We don't know that Max or bunnies by extension are sentient (hence the capitalization) and we don't know that bunnies are rabbits in the GFFA. Also, we can tell that it's a species name, because "Sam" mentions that he's a dog, which is a known species. And strategy guides are C-canon, I believe. Thefourdotelipsis 00:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Absent any hard, canonical evidence to the contrary, we have to go with bunny. We could chase our puffy little tails forever if we try to justify anything else. Gonk ^(Gonk!) 16:14, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
• According to Marvel Star Wars 11, Han says that Jaxxon "looks like a bunny but fights like a tiger." Based on this evidence, I say merge with rabbit. The fact that Max describes himself as a "bunny" no more makes this his proper species name than the fact Jaxxon describes himself as a "rabbit" makes that his proper species name. Besides, there is good evidence that Max, like Jax, is a Lepi.JustinGann 02:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)