This is the talk page for the article "CR-20 troop carrier." This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

In what source are the AT-PTs mentioned? The databank at starwars.com states that when fully loaded, the CR-20 can carry the 40 troopers, 12 speeder bikes, and their corresponding supplies. AT-PTs were never built in large numbers, and most of them were lost on the Katana fleet. JimRaynor55 03:45, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

ConsularEdit

Is it just me, or does the ship look like a Consular-class space cruiser except with a elongated lower hull?Theadmiralty 04:02, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

CR-20 vs. CR20 Edit

Databank entry says "CR20", is there a higher source that indicates "CR-20"? --SparqMan 05:35, 15 May 2005 (UTC)

I don't see any justification for naming it CR-20 when all other CEC ships with this naming convention don't have the "-". SpargMan is correct, it is CR20 in the databank, so I see no reason for me to not change it. Any objections? Zeta1127 of the 89th Legion (talk) 05:24, January 12, 2011 (UTC)

I have no objections to changing the name but CR-20 does sound better.KitFisto19BBY 14:49, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

AOTC Edit

Was this the same ship type that Anakin and Padme rode in to Naboo in AOTC? Kuralyov 23:11, 28 Jul 2005 (UTC)

No, it wasn't. They have similiar designs, but they are not the same type of crafts. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 12:12, 29 Jul 2005 (UTC)

AT-PTs and Class-II frigates Edit

I've seen both mentioned in this article, and I want to know where you are getting them from. I can't find the CR20 in the "Darklighter"-comic and have never heard of AT-PTs being carried aboard these ships. Please provide proper sources. Thank you. VT-16 20:54, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)