Entertainment
 

Talk:Cloak of Deception

From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.

This is the talk page for the article "Cloak of Deception."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Cloak of Deception is a former good article. Please see this article's entry on the AgriCorps page for the reasons why it was removed.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
8 September 2006 Good article nomination Success
25 November 2006 Good article
December 22, 2008 Good article review Removed
January 18, 2009 Former good article
Current status: Former good article


[edit] Publisher's summary

  • I haven't found this quote from any official source, so I removed it from the "Publisher's summary": One man's fall from power could lead to the end of the Republic, and the irreversible rise of the dark side If it is official, please tell me. --Xwing328(Talk) 21:03, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
    • Never mind. It's on the back of the hardcover. —Xwing328(Talk) 19:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rune Haako

What does Rune Haako do in this book? .... 04:54, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Not much. Basically, he just advises Nute Gunray on a few things. --Xwing328(Talk) 02:31, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
    • So nothing really worth mentioning in his article? .... 06:24, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Direct quotations

I decapitalized Human in the Paperback section because the original source did not capitalize the word. If we use a word-for-word quotation, we must keep everything as in the original source, no matter our guidelines or our MoS. I also decapitalized Senate in the opening crawl because the novel does not capitalize Senate (which is, I think, a mistake, hence the [sic]). The opening crawl is in full capitalis, but still, I think it's reasonable to assume, that it would have beensenate had not the author decided to fully capitalize all the words. - TopAce (Talk) 11:02, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

  • I'm removing the sic and re-capitalizing Senate. You can assume that the author intended for it to be grammatically and stylistically correct, which from the author's in-universe perspective, would be Senate capitalized as a proper noun. —Xwing328(Talk) 20:05, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Actually, simpler solution: I just added CSS to capitalize all of the text, so that it reflects the original source even more precisely. —Xwing328(Talk) 20:07, 11 November 2007 (UTC)