Talk:Clone trooper commander
From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.
Contents |
[edit] Sources
I'm seeing good references in sources that say the articles on Clone trooper commanders should be titled one of two ways (using 5052 as an example): CC-5052 or Commander 5052. CC likely stood for Clone Commander, similar to the RC designation used before the Clones in Republic Commando. Thoughts? --SparqMan 01:10, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- That sounds good to me. --Imp 14:41, 27 Jun 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Image
- Can we get that image of Commander Deviss resized to be smaller? Cmdr. J. Nebulax 00:03, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- I can manage that -- Xilentshadow900 00:04, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you. It did take up a lot of space. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 00:04, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- It looks much nicer now Xilentshadow900 00:08, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. It does look nicer now that it is smaller and more out of the way from the text. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 00:13, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- Interesting fact- That picture is actually what Bly was supposed to look like. -- Xilentshadow900 00:15, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- Yeah, and they made a Hasbro figure out of Deviss without knowing his name. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 19:37, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- Interesting fact- That picture is actually what Bly was supposed to look like. -- Xilentshadow900 00:15, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you very much. It does look nicer now that it is smaller and more out of the way from the text. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 00:13, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- It looks much nicer now Xilentshadow900 00:08, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you. It did take up a lot of space. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 00:04, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
- I can manage that -- Xilentshadow900 00:04, 26 Sep 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Uglyness
I guess I have to show you a picture to show you how ugly it looks then. Image:Ugly.PNG Do you see?--Xilentshadow900 21:14, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- That means your screen is way different from mine. My shows it perfectly tucked in to the left in the "Personalization" section. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 21:17, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- either way, it should apply to everybody's screen, and putting it on the right will do that.--Xilentshadow900 21:19, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- I resized it to make it smaller. It should stay on the left, and, if you must do something, make it smaller. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 21:20, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- It does not have to stay on the left. Images can be on the same side. Furthermore, the only way to fix that is to get rid of the text. That image is still too big to be on that side.--Xilentshadow900 21:22, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Well, it should stay on the left. I'll even fix the text. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 21:23, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- It does not have to stay on the left. Images can be on the same side. Furthermore, the only way to fix that is to get rid of the text. That image is still too big to be on that side.--Xilentshadow900 21:22, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- I resized it to make it smaller. It should stay on the left, and, if you must do something, make it smaller. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 21:20, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- either way, it should apply to everybody's screen, and putting it on the right will do that.--Xilentshadow900 21:19, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Image:UGLY!!!.PNGLook, the only way to fix that is going to be to move it to the right. A MODERATOR did it. If its good enough for Riffsyphon1024, it should be good enough for all of us.--Xilentshadow900 21:26, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Why don't we just removed the picture then. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 21:28, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- It's fixed. Are you happy now? Cmdr. J. Nebulax 21:30, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Because it is relevant to the article. Just because everything wont fit into your nice and tidy world where pictures are separated from each other, doesnt mean we have to get rid of it. And yes, I am very happy. Content, to say the least. --Xilentshadow900 21:31, 14 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Before any of this was done, it had fit perfectly in the "Personalization" section anyway. It was because it didn't fit correctly on your screen that we had to move it. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 00:01, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- I'm sure im not the only one here who has a 1024x768 screen and uses a firefox browser.--Xilentshadow900 00:17, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Well, there's no point in discussing this any more. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 00:19, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- I'm sure im not the only one here who has a 1024x768 screen and uses a firefox browser.--Xilentshadow900 00:17, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Before any of this was done, it had fit perfectly in the "Personalization" section anyway. It was because it didn't fit correctly on your screen that we had to move it. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 00:01, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Everybody does know that the format of wiki depends on the viewers screensize settings right? maybe a mod should decide on a uniform screen size, do that everybody edits in that format and post a warning on the main page about the recomended screen size. Razzy1319 08:16, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- OR, we should apply to as many screen sizes as possible.--Xilentshadow900 11:39, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- that's good to if you can find a way to do that.
- It would be good as once screen size, but that would be too much of a hassle for some people. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 21:52, 15 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Just how freetime do you have Xilent? :P -- Riffsyphon1024 19:23, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- A ton, really. --Xilentshadow900 20:04, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- I'll say... Cmdr. J. Nebulax 20:16, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Good thing too, or I wouldn't be able to contribute the battles of the NJO series, which need work. --Xilentshadow900 20:47, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Then get to work, soldier. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 20:53, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- AND I take care of all of Traviss's stuff. Or most of it anyway. And I'll get to work when I finish Dark Tide II.--Xilentshadow900 21:13, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Well, if you need any help, I'm always ready. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 21:20, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- AND I take care of all of Traviss's stuff. Or most of it anyway. And I'll get to work when I finish Dark Tide II.--Xilentshadow900 21:13, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Then get to work, soldier. Cmdr. J. Nebulax 20:53, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Good thing too, or I wouldn't be able to contribute the battles of the NJO series, which need work. --Xilentshadow900 20:47, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- I'll say... Cmdr. J. Nebulax 20:16, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- A ton, really. --Xilentshadow900 20:04, 16 Nov 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Odd Ball
Odd Ball isn't a commander. He's just a captain, right? So he should be taken off the list of commanders.
- Wrong. Admiral J. Nebulax 14:47, 24 Nov 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Gyass
Source? Canon?JustinGann 01:11, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- I'm still trying to get an answer from the guy who puts him in, Clone Commander. He just won't talk, and he keeps taking the sources tag out. Try talking to him here, but be kind. Don't threaten him, as he may be a missinformed fan. -- SFH 01:19, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Well, if he won't talk and keeps adding this fanon creation, there's no point to be "nice". Admiral J. Nebulax 20:10, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- He gone under a different name now, User:Clone comander. Trying to avoid us? -- Riffsyphon1024 20:17, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Most likely. Admiral J. Nebulax 20:20, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- He gone under a different name now, User:Clone comander. Trying to avoid us? -- Riffsyphon1024 20:17, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Well, if he won't talk and keeps adding this fanon creation, there's no point to be "nice". Admiral J. Nebulax 20:10, 30 Nov 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Rank badges?
Has anyone else noticed the small badge on Commander Cody? It looks very similar to the Imperial rank badges. Any thoughts? -- SFH 13:03, 7 April 2006 (PDT)
- Perhaps it signified a commando commander. Admiral J. Nebulax (talk)
20:16, 7 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] So by the time of the Empire...
So by the time of the Empire, it appears that most, if not all officers in the Imperial Military are non-clone graduates. So that begs the question "what happened to the clone commanders?" Did the clone officers (sergeants, lieutenants, commanders, etc) just phase out? If so, did the Empire just regulate clones to being mere infantry units? (JordanRevin08 10:18, 3 July 2008 (UTC)JordanRevin08)
