Talk:Corellian-class cruiser
Back to page
Length.
Edit
What's the source for that length? —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
01:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Bigger than a 600 m bulk cruiser, I guess. I'm marking it with "?": it could be the same size as a bulk cruiser, or even smaller, so long as it's big compared to the Falcon/ —Silly Dan (talk) 02:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
11:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, I see. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
Name: "cruiser" vs. "Star Cruiser"
Edit
Doesn't it say "Corellian-class cruiser", not "Star Cruiser", in Star Wars Official Poster Monthly 1? Are we assuming all instances of the term "cruiser" to describe big ships should be "Star Cruiser" or something? —Silly Dan (talk) 12:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- It's called an "Imperial starcruiser" in the other written sources. I suspect they all referred to the Imperial-class seen in the film, since that's what every issue focuses on and I believe was the original reason behind Han Solo's remark in the film. Even the Executor was sometimes called a starcruiser or star-cruiser back in the day in the early comics. Barring all that, the way to write Star Cruiser in modern sources is with or without capital letters. VT-16 12:23, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Carillion-class
Edit
the "Carillion-class starship" is probably meant to be the same thingJustinGann 04:51, 1 July 2008 (UTC)