Talk:Cybernetics
Back to page
Contents |
Move
Edit
Move to Prosthesis? --SparqMan 17:36, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Size of Vader's Prosthetics
Edit
I've noticed that most of the books that describe Darth Vader all say that his limbs were huge, maybe even grossly out of proportions. But all the movies show his limbs as average sized. Explanation please. user:Darth Vatrir
- What sources are you talking about? HavetStorm 12:17, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- The novelization of Revenge of the Sith and the novel Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader both describe Vader's limbs being monstrous and ungainly, twice the size of his original limbs. user:Darth Vatrir
- They give the impression of that, they don't actually use those words do they? Plus Vader was actually bigger physically than Anakin.. Jedi Dude 19:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Wrong, the Revenge of the Sith novel blatantly states that his limbs are monstrous and ungainly, and Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader says that his hands are at least twice the size of his original, so it would be safe to assume that so are the rest of his limbs. user:Darth Vatrir
- Hmmmm monstrous and ungainly does not mean out of proportion, and as i said Vader was physically bigger, so he may be viewed as monstrous and huge, its describtive writing its not saying his hands are actually like HUGE... Jedi Dude 20:10, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Here is the quote from the novel that supports me: "To some eyes, its jointed limbs might have looked ungainly, even monstrous,.."Notice the emphasise on the limbs. user:Darth Vatrir
- Hmmmm monstrous and ungainly does not mean out of proportion, and as i said Vader was physically bigger, so he may be viewed as monstrous and huge, its describtive writing its not saying his hands are actually like HUGE... Jedi Dude 20:10, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- Wrong, the Revenge of the Sith novel blatantly states that his limbs are monstrous and ungainly, and Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader says that his hands are at least twice the size of his original, so it would be safe to assume that so are the rest of his limbs. user:Darth Vatrir
- They give the impression of that, they don't actually use those words do they? Plus Vader was actually bigger physically than Anakin.. Jedi Dude 19:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- The novelization of Revenge of the Sith and the novel Dark Lord: The Rise of Darth Vader both describe Vader's limbs being monstrous and ungainly, twice the size of his original limbs. user:Darth Vatrir
- What sources are you talking about? HavetStorm 12:17, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
- "To some eyes, its jointed limbs might have looked ungainly, even monstrous" - Doesn't sound like a definite, literal statement. To my eyes Vader's limbs look neither ungainly, nor monstrous. They look totaly in proportion with the rest of his body. Without context it's hard to know how to correctly interpret that sentence. HavetStorm 16:22, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- This argument is about how the discription conflicts with the appearance. user:Darth Vatrir
Force Powers
Edit
What about Force Powers? According to Lumiya a being would lose bits of his or her Force-potential by prosthetic limbs and such, but what about Return of the Jedi? I checked it and Luke uses Force Choke/Grip on a Gamorrean Guard with his right prosthetic hand. Anakin can be seen Choking a Skakoan (The Techno Union guys) in Clone Wars #25 with his prosthetic right arm. Does this mean it just takes more energy/focus to use Force Powers with a prosthetic limb or are Darth Vader and Lumiya two extremes who could not master the full power of the Force because they were 'more machine then man/woman'? Crimson Jax 11:35, 11 April 2007 (UTC +2)
- I know what you mean; Lumiya certainly shed some light on this concern. I know Vader had his limbs originally severed, but he stilled mastered Force Choke in A New Hope and Empire Strikes Back quite efficiently. In ESB he even multi-tasked without even gesturing with his hand while giving orders to Admiral Ozzel's "replacement". I think body motion associated with affecting things/beings around you with the Force is for psychological purposes and not required. Darth Caedus slammed someone's head into a table without a gesture, too, and he had all of his limbs. It makes sense that Force powers would be diminished with diminished body mass (losing limbs), but depending upon force-potential, it may not appear to hamper the said force-adept's ability/affinity. I that what you're asking?--Anonyhm 01:12, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Wait a minute!
Edit
Can we really use that picture of Darth Maul from Old Wounds? It's non-canon. <Admiral06 23:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)>
Expansion and Move
Edit
Added significant amount of expansion and moved from "Prosthetic replacements" to "Cybernetics" which is a more fitting title
- The-Truth 02:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
Galactic viewpoint
Edit
I understand that most deizens of the galaxy didn't like cybernetics, but I don't understand why. I suppose the jedi don't like them, because it may interfere with their connection with the force, but on the whole real life people are more open minded about them then they are in Star Wars. It's just, in a place with crazy advanced robots and vastly superior medicines to ours, why should a fake leg disgust people? 70.179.98.58 01:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Behind the Scenes
Edit
Can we have a source for those claims please
- They're false I believe. It was only the very end of the finger which regrew, which regrows naturally.
Grievous' list
Edit
From what I heard, he also still has his spinocord.