Talk:DC-17m Interchangeable Weapon System
From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.
Contents |
[edit] 999
what's the 999 mean?216.26.223.130 06:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- What 999? ----Ryluk Shouja(The Mukhabarat|Join SWGames!08:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 08:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Take a look at the image.
below and to the right of the front sight. 216.26.212.143 10:23, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Number of shots. However, in the game, that actually appears at the top of the back of the rifle. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
11:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- But in the article it says that when the blaster attachment is in use it has a capacity of 60 shots. 216.26.201.234 07:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have a feeling that the 999 shots is just game mechanics. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
11:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- The 999 shots is just in that picture. And I'm pretty sure it has more than just 60 shots. ----Ryluk Shouja(The Mukhabarat|Join SWGames!)08:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 06:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Another possiblilty is that since it is just the base chassis, the number of shots is reset to the largest capacity when there is no attachment. ----Ryluk Shouja(The Mukhabarat|Join SWGames!)08:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 06:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- The 999 shots is just in that picture. And I'm pretty sure it has more than just 60 shots. ----Ryluk Shouja(The Mukhabarat|Join SWGames!)08:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC) 06:55, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- I have a feeling that the 999 shots is just game mechanics. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
sorry that I didn't respond sooner, but I think that this picture rules out when there is no attachment that the number of shots is reset to the largest number
in the picture there is the blaster attachment on the base mount but the number is still 999 instead of 60, and the same thing with the picture of the sniper attachment the number is 999 instead of 5. and also since I haven't played the game as you can probably tell I was wondering can you fire the blaster with the anti-armor attachment on, the reason I'm wondering about this is because the anti-armor attachment is on the left side of the blaster, so that I guess in theory that since its like that therefore leaving the barrel unobstructed then you can fire the blaster 216.26.220.253 21:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC) and thanks to all of you who have answered My questions, I also asked a few other questions on different talk pages heres a list of them [[1]] , if any of You could answer them that would be great.
- No, the anti-armor attachment is, when on the weapon, on the main barrel. Only one weapon can be used at a time. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
23:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Thanks question solved. 216.211.51.199 00:36, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Price
Can anyone tell me what the price would be for one of these things. 216.211.51.199 02:58, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Other Attachments
Wasn't there a fourth attachment in the RepCom books? A Nonlethal crowd control thing? I think it was called a PEP or something. edit: never mind it's there now.
Why was the PEP removed from this article? If you check the history, it was removed April 23 of this year. It's as much an attachment as the three game attachments even though it first appeared in Triple Zero and not Republic Commando. -annonymous June 22, 2008 2:37 PM
[edit] Power
In the article about the E-5 blaster rifle it is stated that the E-5 blaster rifle fired blaster bolts just as powerful as the DC-17m blaster attachment's blaster bolts. Also in the article about the DC-15A blaster rifle it is stated that the DC-15A blaster rifle fired more powerful blaster bolts than the E-5 blaster rifle, so if the E-5 is just as powerful as the DC-17m blaster attachment and the DC-15A blaster rifle is more powerful than the E-5, then that means the DC-15A blaster rifle is more powerful than the DC-17m blaster attachment. It makes sense that in a weapon that reconfigures to other weapons that the blaster attachment would be less powerful than a weapon that's all blaster because the manufacturers would need to sacrifice firepower and ammunition capacity to make a weapon that changes to other weapons.--Darth Malice the Destroyer 18:49, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
[edit] PEP Laser
Is there a picture of the PEP Laser attachment anywhere? If only there is a picture of it.--Darth Malice the Destroyer 02:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
That'd be cool, but what about the new grenade launcher and the rapid door breach attachments from the Commando Series. Do we have any images of any of these? FettClone1 00:11, September 27, 2009 (UTC)
There's more attachments?--Darth Malice the Destroyer 15:23, September 27, 2009 (UTC)
Yeah it talks about them in Commandos: True Colors and Order 66. like I listed above, there should be at least two. They say that they're new, but they still apply, right. FettClone1 00:58, September 28, 2009 (UTC)
