Wikia

Talk:Dalek

Back to page

This is the talk page for the article "Dalek."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

1 ZOMGWTF!
2 ?!
3 Dalek appearence possibly origonally an in-joke.
4 article illustration shows the wrong part of the cover
5 Ambig?
6 That
7 um

ZOMGWTF!Edit

What? What? WHAT?! —Unsigned comment by Aybfreak (talk • contribs).

Well This article is totaly uninformitive. -Annonymouse /b/tard- —Unsigned comment by 172.166.3.88 (talk • contribs).

?!Edit

Is this article about the Dalek from Docter Who?! —Unsigned comment by Paleontologist.piczo (talk • contribs).

Dalek appearence possibly origonally an in-joke.Edit

Perhaps the Dalek appearence on the cover was just a joke? I'm tempted to hunt down the comic to see if they actually have an appearence within the interiour pages. Seeing as how the illustration was just hidden in a small corner, it leads me to believe the the artist snuck the Dalek in as a joke. Artists are known to do that, this coming from an artist. XD

I'll look up the comic and see if there are any appearences of Daleks within the interiour panels... Trak Nar 03:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Even though it was certainly put in as a joke or easter egg, cover paintings are generally taken as canonical on some level, aren't they? —Silly Dan _(talk) 21:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- From what I gathered, seems like. Daleks are cool and it would be interesting to see some more of 'em intermingling in the EU. Knowing how crafty Daleks are, they'd find a way into the SW universe... Trak Nar 01:03, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

article illustration shows the wrong part of the coverEdit

the plunger sticking upwards presumably belongs to the Dalek. the part of the drawing cropped and used in the article does not really look like a Dalek. --Stardizzy2 16:35, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

Ambig?Edit

Can we slap an ambig on this? Dr.Kermit^{(Babble here)} 22:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

i think that would be a good idea —Unsigned comment by 68.61.39.108 (talk • contribs).

ThatEdit

that does not even lok like a dalek, is there a canon source referring to them as dalek . . . how about a source refferring to these supposed daleks ascyborgs (like it says in the cyborgs article) if not why all of the insanity? ralok 12:11, June 5, 2010 (UTC)