Pretty nice little page...Always liked the Defels..
Do we need "Notable Defel" if the infobox includes the same basic stuff? Gonk 20:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
I edited the Biology and appearance section for clarity. Please correct me if I misinterpreted anything.
The only (intentional) change of substance was from "ultraviolet supergiant" to "blue supergiant". The former term suggests that the star does not emit any visible light, while the article text indicates this is not the case. –Cúthalion (talk) 02:19, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- It all seems to be clearer wording to me. The only change I made was the "ultraviolet supergiant" bit, which is what GG4 calls their star. (The Sun's a yellow star, but it emits light in other portions of the spectrum, so an "ultraviolet" star could emit blue light too.) —Silly Dan (talk) 03:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- I just went by what GG4 said, without reference to the pictures. I don't think that width claim is repeated in any other sources...maybe it should be removed? —Silly Dan (talk) 03:37, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Someone might want to add a pic of a female Defel. I distinctly remember one or two female consorts of Shoto in the Horn Station storyJustinGann 11:46, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Source for quote Edit
The quote needs to be sourced. Domlith 15:55, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
- It came to my attention while going over this page that there are a couple of images near the bottom of the page that unless I am mistaken are actually Shistavanens, not Defels. Anyway, If they were Defels, we wouldn't be able to see them in their natural state - only as a shadow. Has this dawned on anyone else? —Unsigned comment by The truth hurts... (talk • contribs).