Canon or Not?Edit

I've noticed that some articles listing this as their only source have been labeled as "ambiguously canon." If something wasn't licensed by LFL, then it's simply noncanon and no better than fan fiction. Did LFL approve of this magazine's SW articles, or not? JimRaynor55 21:49, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)

• We're still not 100% sure, which is why they're listed as ambiguous. There's been some discusion here and here. jSarek 22:01, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)
• That is apparently not true, see the discussion on Polyhedron 59 for details. Geekmasterflash 22:01, 2 Dec 2005 (UTC)