Contents 1 Merge with Battle of Utapau 1.1 Vote 1.1.1 For 1.1.2 Against 1.1.3 Comments

Merge with Battle of UtapauEdit

I feel that this event should be considered a part of the larger Battle of Utapau rather than a separate duel. Therefore, I propose merging and redirecting it into said article. - Angel Blue^(Holonet) 00:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

VoteEdit

ForEdit

1. Angel Blue^(Holonet) 00:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
2. Imp 00:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
3. —Silly Dan _(talk) 01:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
4. Lord Oblivion^{Sith holocron} 20:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
5. Still a part of the Battle of Utapau. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 22:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
6. Jedi Dude 22:09, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
7. In light of the new information obtained by Imp i say merge MERGE! Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks^{Whine Here} 22:23, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
8. Make it so. Atarumaster88 ^{(Audience Chamber)} 04:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
9. Yes, it should be merged. It will be a way to synthesize one fact and make it more comprehensible. Go ahead with the merging. Battle Surgeon ^talk
10. Like, yeah, for sure! The two are pretty much the same. Asploder

AgainstEdit

# Sorry but they are two different fights. Ugluk: Destroyer of Redlinks^{Whine Here} 00:58, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

1. Yes, that is true.--IG-Prime^{(Sentience Core)} 11:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

CommentsEdit

They're not really different fights, they are parts of the same battle, in the same way that the duel on Invisible Hand was part of the Second Battle of Coruscant. - Angel Blue^(Holonet) 01:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

• And the same way the duel on Naboo was part of the Second Battle of Theed.--Lord Oblivion^{Sith holocron} 20:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• That is a wrong thing to do, and I say all duels should have their own articles, and not part of a larger battle. Why is Duel in Palpatine's office not part of order 66, or the Jedi Purge? This would explain the low number of duel articles. Almost all duels are part of a larger battle. This method of thinking is clearly flawed, you must see the reason of my thinking.--IG-Prime^{(Sentience Core)} 22:39, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
  • That doesn't mean we have to agree with it. When a duel is a part of a larger battle, it should be merged; when a duel isn't a part of a battle, it can't be merged since it would have no place to go to. The Duel in the Chancellor's Office is an example of this. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax ^{(Imperial Holovision)} 22:40, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
    • Yes, but it makes no sense. I suppose I can't outdo you all, so since I cannot persuade you, nor outnumber, or overwhelm you, I will just have to accept you, for the time being.--IG-Prime^{(Sentience Core)} 01:25, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
      • What exactly doesn't make sense? I don't see why duels that are part of a larger battle shouldn't be merged with that battle. - Angel Blue ^(Holonet) 01:27, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
        • Since it's been about a week, should I go ahead and merge? - Angel Blue ^(Holonet) 17:00, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
  • uh huh Jedi Dude 23:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC)