Entertainment
 

Talk:Executor-class Star Dreadnought

From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.

This is the talk page for the article "Executor-class Star Dreadnought."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

This talk page has archives.
1


Anybody mind researching and listing all of the Executor-class Destroyers from the EU? =P

It would b e a great help...

  • I don't think we need a list. There's already a category. Chack Jadson (Talk) 19:30, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
  • The category here has most of the Star Dreadnoughts we know of so far. VT-16 13:43, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

The Annhilator is an Executor-class.Darth Oompa Loompa 21:36, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Maximum aceleration

I dont think it makes sense

Maximum acceleration

1230 G


1230 G force it is imposible to survive

I think it is more like 1,23 G


96.20.90.148 00:20, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

    • Don't forget that they're in space, and can generate their own gravity. The Venator-class Star Destroyer's accelleration was 3,000G. This is a LOT faster than the Executor-class Star Dreadnought. Is there anything in canon that says the crews of the Venator-class died due to the movement? 203.123.89.166 03:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
      • That's why all starships have inertial compensators, to keep people from becoming splotches on the walls. VT-16 16:05, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Size

I think the size on this is wrong i think its only 12,800 meters long --Boba Jango Fett 06:05, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Boba Jango Fett

  • The size of the Executor-class has been a matter of continual debate, but the official Lucasfilm figure direct from the website is nineteen kilometres - this is correct, and fits better with the size of the Executor seen in the films than the previous mistaken length of 8 kilometres. The 12800m figure was on the Databank for a short time as a compromise figure, but it has since been replaced and is no longer relevant. See the 'Behind the scenes' section of the article for the full tortuous story.

Bottom line: The films and the Databank both now say it was 19 km long, and that's how it's going to stay. This is the correct canon figure. Unsigned comment by CommanderJB (talk • contribs).

[edit] Page title

I've moved the page back to "Dreadnought" per its established canonical name as presented in  Super Star Destroyer in the Databank, pg. 171 of Star Wars: Complete Locations, and  Starship Battles Preview 1 on Wizards.com (article). Nothing ever describes the ship as a "Dreadnaught" except a brief mention in Classic Star Wars, which even calls the ship a "Dreadnought" some issues later. Toprawa and Ralltiir 01:33, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

they say it is that long becuase there is an atrophysicist at I beleive it is Theforce.net who calculated that in reference to the curvature of the 2nd death star (at a diameter of 900 km) it is 17 or better yet see the following 


http://www.theforce.net/swtc/dagger.html