This is the original text of the novel where the planet is first mentioned (chapter 8, page 128):

"What do' you think?" Control retorted, his voice suddenly dark. "We know what you Jedi can do, Skywalker-don't think we don't. I figure that from that little ride through our base alone you've probably already dug out enough dirty silt about our operation to send everyone here to Fodurant or Beauchen for the next twenty years. You think we're going to just sit here and let you do that to us, you're crazy.

Could it be all pasted in the article or that's not fair use?

If so I can´t put also the quotation of the second mention in the other book. --Palpatine81 23:26, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

PD: Kuralyov was who wrote it was "extremely inhospitable", but I haven´t found it anywhere and there are only two references to the planet in the novels of expanded universe. If any webpage or magazine tells that perhaps that shouldn´t appear.

From Talk:FondurantEdit

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 February 2007. The result of the discussion was redirect to Fodurant.

This article was created (see first edition) according to two reference links:

• Bob Vitas' Completely Unofficial Star Wars Encyclopedia

• The Completely Unofficial Star Wars Encyclopedia

I search where the planet was mentioned and I haven´t found it in HT novel I or II. So it must be a typo like Fonfor instead or Fondor. It must be caused because Fondurant is a French location or by a mistake with Fodurant, mentioned in Hero´s Trial I. I think this page must be deleted. --Palpatine81 12:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• I'll turn it into a redirect. They're too similar to be separate planets - \\Captain Kwenn// ^{— Ahoy!} 12:35, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Agreed. Once again, it slips through the proofreading cracks! ^Jorrel_Fraajic 14:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)