Talk:Force Adept
Back to page
Move/Merge with Dark Side Adept 
Edit
Should this be moved to Force Adepts, because it's about the group, not individuals? Jorrel Fraajic 19:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For
- Jorrel Fraajic 19:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Definetly. This is totally unecassary, these were just a group of dark side adepts. I think it should be merged with Dark Side Adept.--1upD 14:57, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Against
- See below in the STOP category. Mrobviousjosh
Comments
- It might possibly need to be merged into Dark Side Adept. -- I need a name (Complain here) 19:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hmmm... I see that... yeah, it looks like the same concept. If it comes down to merging it, I'll do it Jorrel Fraajic 19:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
STOP!Edit
I read in a roleplaying book(didn't play the game) once that a force adept was a force sensitive that was neither Jedi nor Sith. Obviously, 'Force Adepts' aren't just the group of them seen in FoC. Plus, I think in-game they were called Dark Side Adepts.--1upD 14:55, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
I agree. In the roleplaying game, and other sources like Ithorian herd leaders who were force sensitive healers, these force-sensitives didn't tap into a light or dark side of the force but learned to manipulate it. Place "dark side adept" under one of the organizations and that should be sufficient- since they aren't "jedi" or "sith." Also, merging the articles could give the misrepresentation that force adepts were always in the employ of the Empire, like force adepts were according to the article, miniatures game, and roleplaying game. Mrobviousjosh 04:29, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Wookify?Edit
WHAT information is "Out of Universe" in the article??? There have been two canon depictions of force adepts and the material cited is ALL CANON. I wish people that insert templates would explain why they do so...Can anyone explain this or fix the "mistakes?" Thanks. mrobviousjosh 23:21, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
