Talk: Form VII/Legends

This is the talk page for the article "Form VII/Legends."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for discussing the topic in question. For general questions about the article's topic, please visit Wookieepedia Discussions. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

This talk page has archives.
1

Form VII/Legends is a Featured article, which means it has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wookieepedia community. If you see a way this page can be updated or improved without compromising previous work, please feel free to contribute.

Template:FeaturedOn

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
4 February 2009	Article status not specified	Success
19 April 2009	Featured article

Current status: Featured article

In the new background book: Book of Sith by Daniel Wallace, the issue of Bane's teacher using the term Vaapad for Form VII is actually brought up. One of the annotations to that part of the book, by Quinlan Vos, actually notes that Mace and Bane's teacher used the same name, as says "Could Mace be a Sith? Nah. Still, I'll look into it."

This may imply that while Drew Karpyshyn thought he made an error in Path of Destruction, that book reference is being confirmed as correct. --hamish 86.177.20.98 08:24, April 28, 2012 (UTC)

This is a pretty significant retcon, and at the very least, deserves mention in the Behind the Scenes section. I find it quite ridiculous that a typo has resulted in this much retconning, first with Leland Chee stating that Juyo and Vaapad were used interchangably, now this. Before too long, we may need a whole section devoted to "The Vaapad Retcons". Sorry to go off on a tangent, but please tell me I'm not alone in this. Jensaarai (talk) 09:42, August 4, 2012 (UTC)

You're not alone here, man. I say we put in Kas'im's version of Vaapad into play. Lord KOT (talk) 18:09, July 17, 2014 (UTC)