Article milestones Date Process Result 8 January 2008 Featured article candidate Success 16 January 2008 Featured article 16 January 2011 Featured article review Removed 13 February 2011 Former featured article May 17, 2011 Featured article candidate Success September 21, 2011 Featured article
Current status: Featured article

Has anyone actually figured out what the Glurrg says when you click on it? It'd make fantastic Behind the Scenes info! :)

Elaborate please MoffRebus 12:18, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

They make really weird sounds. — Aiddat ^{(Holonet) (Contribs Log)} 13:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Yep. Sounds like my stomach after too much pizza. Enochf 14:01, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Non-sentientEdit

"Glurrgs are not stipulated in the game to be sentient or non-sentient, though the fact that their species name is de-capitalized in an in-game dialogue sequence spoken by Marsune indicates that they are possibly non-sentient. However, no official clarification of the matter was given until the release of The Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia in 2008, which confirmed that they were non-sentient."

So it's been settled for one year now. Wouldn't we change it in the body of the article?

LelalMekha 11:28, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

• You're absolutely right. I've updated the article accordingly. Atarumaster88 ^{(Talk page)} 15:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

• • Thanks. Also, can they be non-sentient AND actually able to use technology? Well, canon is canon but sometimes one can wonder how good is our definition of sentience. LelalMekha 16:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

• • Hmmm..., well, I do realise that in all canon sources glurrgs are recognised as non-sapient (I refuse to use the term non sentient) but since they can use tools, and communicate with each other would make glurrgs sapient in real life, just pointing that out though, I don't think it should be changed. BUT, just to clarify, glurrgs can indeed think, and shooting one in it's adorable little foot WOULD hurt it. So I agree with Lelalmeka Tristan7grunt 03:58, July 8, 2011 (UTC)tristan7grunt

SlavesEdit

"Also, they were non-sentient. However, whether they were symbiotic or employed as slaves to the Gungans was unknown."

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't slaves sentient by definition? If they're non-sentient, they're work animals, not slaves.