Talk:Ground Armored Tank
Back to page
However, some were re-activated on planets of little or no strategic value.
I'd like to know the context of this statement, and the source, please. :) VT-16 01:00, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
- Probably no source. But, I suppose it's logical to assume that some CIS loyalists and fanatics or some black market dealers could have got their hands on them. However, if someone doesn't provide a source and citation soon, I'll just go ahead and remove it. Unit 8311 20:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Likely no source. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
21:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hold in. It citates Insider 62 as a source in there. Perhaps someone who collects Insider could help...?Unit 8311 18:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's a shame, because I started with Insider 63. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
21:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well, is there anyone who perhaps has possession of earlier issues? Unit 8311 20:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'll see if I can find anyone. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
20:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'll see if I can find anyone. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Well, is there anyone who perhaps has possession of earlier issues? Unit 8311 20:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's a shame, because I started with Insider 63. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Hold in. It citates Insider 62 as a source in there. Perhaps someone who collects Insider could help...?Unit 8311 18:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Likely no source. —Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Probably no source. But, I suppose it's logical to assume that some CIS loyalists and fanatics or some black market dealers could have got their hands on them. However, if someone doesn't provide a source and citation soon, I'll just go ahead and remove it. Unit 8311 20:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)