Talk:Heavy Assault Vehicle/wheeled A6 Juggernaut
Back to page
Contents |
Battlefront II
Edit
Was it in it or not, I dont see anything playable, but it is in cutsceces so that w\ould cout as EP III, so if its in it I wont touch the appearances Revan 19:07, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- It's not in the game. Admiral J. Nebulax 20:45, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Took it out 21:47, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Thank you. Admiral J. Nebulax 22:16, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Took it out 21:47, 29 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Obi-Wan fought on top of one in the Revenge of the Sith Video game on one of the Utapu levels after Order 66, though most people seem to not like the game in terms of canon. But still, an appearance is an appearance?
- Nonetheless, it appeared there. Admiral J. Nebulax 22:09, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm, should it be noted as participating in the Battle of Utapau, then? Since I don't think an appearance of something constitutes pure game mechanics. And I think some of the highways seen in the Pau map in CLOSW, could support a vehicle of that size. VT-16 22:56, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, it should be noted as participating in the Battle of Utapau. Admiral J. Nebulax 00:33, 11 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm, should it be noted as participating in the Battle of Utapau, then? Since I don't think an appearance of something constitutes pure game mechanics. And I think some of the highways seen in the Pau map in CLOSW, could support a vehicle of that size. VT-16 22:56, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)
- I've seen it included in a couple mods, but never as anything "drivable", perhaps it was a model left over that they never actually included in-game?129.107.81.12 16:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
TurboTank
Edit
Is there any canon source where it is referred to as the Turbotank? I was under the impression that LEGO was the only place where that name was used. --Roosmacfan 05:43, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
Steering
Edit
Can the TurboTank drive both ends? The pod is on the back, but in the movie the pod side in driving.
- Yeah, both ends can drive. It's got two cockpits. -LtNOWIS 02:51, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- And no one knows which is the actual front end of the vehicle because of it. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
13:58, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
- And no one knows which is the actual front end of the vehicle because of it. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
Ok why does the A5 page diagram show the small cockpit as the front, however on the A6 cross sections diagram it shows the opposite. Also the B5 article lists the small cockpit as the front also. Has this been retconned anywhere? --Z3r0x 01:42, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
Higher than at-at???
Edit
I highly doubt it is that tall! even with the look out post
- If canon says so, it's higher that an AT-AT. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
21:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
- Well, the lookout post is obviously where that height comes from, because the main vehicle is definitely not taller. I can tell from the people next to it. The AT-AT was much taller compared to people next to it. But the Turbo Tank's mast is extremely high, and the height listing is dictated by the highest point, so in that respect it is indeed taller than the AT-AT. ZeldaTheSwordsman 19:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
500? Are you joking?
Edit
- 300-500!!!! passengers? Are you joking? Source please! Atarumaster88 17:30, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- I believe the RotS: ICS is the source. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
18:28, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, I don't think the 500 figure has a source. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
18:33, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, I don't think the 500 figure has a source. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- I believe the RotS: ICS is the source. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- 50 troops was what the A5 model could handle. Since the A6 is twice as large, the internal volume is about eight times as much, so six times as many troops is managable. And 300 is in ROTS:ICS. VT-16 10:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- So 500 is so far unsourced. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
13:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yup. They might have physical space for it, but unless the troops are accommedated for, it's not official. VT-16 15:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
20:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
- Yup. They might have physical space for it, but unless the troops are accommedated for, it's not official. VT-16 15:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- So 500 is so far unsourced. Fleet Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
Juggernauts in Crimson Empire?
Edit
I'm looking at the Crimson Empire paperback comic, and it appears that when the Imperials invaded the Rebel camp, the Imperials are using a couple of Juggernauts. Are these perhaps later models, because I don't see Crimson Empire listed in the apperances section. Just thought I'd bring this up. 8311-XHT 01:33, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- They're actually earlier models. The HAV/w A5 Juggernaut, I believe. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
01:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
Oh, thanks. 8311-XHT 02:22, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- No problem. Grand Admiral J. Nebulax (Imperial Holovision)
12:05, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
5.3 Factual correction
Edit
In the pictures section, there needs to be a correction. The juggernaut used in the Star Wars: Clone Wars Holocron Heist episode, the first battle of Felucia, is a Heavy Assault Vehicle/wheeled A5 Juggernaut, not a Heavy Assault Vehicle/wheeled A6 Juggernaut, as it says in the pics section, rescue on felucia.jpg. It should probably be placed in the A5 fact page. I am sure it is the A5 variant not the A6 as listed. At least in the history section, it says at least one juggernaut was used in the battle of Felucia. but it does not specify which variant. Here are some reasons why I am sure it is the A5 variant. The difference between the A5 and A6 is the size. In the pic, we see the Juggernaut next to a AT-TE, and while it is larger and only about twice the length of the AT-TE. An AT-TE is 13.2 meters long. The A5 Juggernaut is 22 meters long. The A6 is 49.4 meters long. If it was an A6 variant it would dwarf the AT-TE, being four times longer! When you check out the picture, and the Juggernaut has the dimension of a HAW/A5 Juggernaut, if we use the AT-TE for size comparison.
In the Star Wars Chronicles: The Prequels book, in the foldout section titled Comparison Chart 2: Ground Vehicles and Starfighters we see the size difference is clear. In this book, we see that the AT-TE is only as tall as the wheels of the HAV/A6 Variant and the length of the AT-TE extends only halfway to the second wheel. Due to the size factors, the vehicle in question must be a Heavy Assault Vehicle/A5 Juggernaut and not the A6 Variant that is listed. Just thought I'd like to know if my thoughts were the consensus. Sandtrooper Platoon 09:22, July 14, 2010 (UTC)