Someone who doesn't understand the purpose of talk pagesEdit

Has anyone else noticed that, even with the missile defense mechanism, these things are practically useless (can't hover across water/lava, slow acceleration). Even with minor in-game modding (such as allowing it to crush smaller vehicles and giving it missiles), the vehicle simply isn't a practical transport. Heavy Metal Is The Law 15:54, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Rename the article Edit

I feel that the current name (Heavy Assault Vehicle Transport B5 Juggernaut) for this article does not conform with the established naming convention for the HAVw Juggernaut series. Just because that is how the designers wrote it does not mean that this should be the actual name. The name should be Heavy Assault Vehicle/transport B5 Juggernaut. —Unsigned comment by Zeta1127,89thLegion (talk • contribs).

Regardless of the name not conforming to the known naming pattern, the article will remain at the canon name assigned to it. Unfortunately, personal preference has no bearing on the matter. If official sources name the vehicle the way it is titled, then it remains at that name. If other sources come to light which modify the name, then a discussion will be necessary to sort out the conflicts. - Cavalier One^{(Squadron channel)} 23:13, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

Just because the designers write a name a certain way doesn't mean that they are right, but maybe is should be worth noting that HAVt B5 Juggernaut is probably the name at the very least. Zeta1127,89thLegion 05:57, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

In the FoC manual and the Complete Star Wars Encyclopedia article and most likely the encyclopedia itself, the Juggernaut is named HAVt B5 Juggernaut Transport. While manuals are notorious for having typos, can't we use it and TCSWE to justify naming this article, Heavy Assault Vehicle/transport B5 Juggernaut? Zeta1127 of the 89th Legion (talk) 23:19, January 7, 2011 (UTC)