Talk:History of the galaxy

From Wookieepedia, the Star Wars wiki.

Should we expand on this article or is it better to keep our Timeline of galactic history the primary history article? -- Riffsyphon1024 01:28, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)

• I'd prefer we keep the timeline article our primary source. -- SFH 01:37, 18 Nov 2005 (UTC)
  • I think that the timeline should be like a quick reference while this article could go into greater detail. --24.247.126.44 00:43, 20 Nov 2005 (UTC)
    • I don't think this is needed, really. It's covered in other timelines. QuentinGeorge 22:12, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Keep, I'm working on improvements. 81.131.61.47

• There should be only one 'Timeline of the Galaxy ' .Two is not necessary.-Kai Ataru
  • It depends on your point of view. Adding an in-depth summary of the timeline to the bare bones version may make the article long enough to cause problems for some computers to load, as is the case with articles like the List of Starships. Jwebb13^HoloNet 22:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] What Improvements?

If this is to be kept alongside the Timeline, how can this article be improved upon? Personally, I think it's duplicate information, and that time may be better spent by expounding on the Timeline on the already robust itself. In order to justify having this article, those in favor should post the improvements that can be made here that would set it apart from the Timeline. -SonofNils 01:29, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I'm new, but I don't see the point

I'm not really noticing anything in this article that isn't already depicted in the Timeline article, and I don't really see a purpose for this article in the first place? - Noahferfer 14:55, 21 December 2007 (UTC)