Talk:I, Jedi
Back to page
Contents |
Tone
Edit
What's wrong with the tone of this article? KEJ 13:44, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Second paragraph was too anti-KJA. Tried to fix it. — Silly Dan 14:27, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
- Nice job, man :-D KEJ 14:28, 25 Nov 2005 (UTC)
Unrelated to that, saying the novel is "(to date) is the only one written completely in first person view" is awkward when it's difficult to determine when the sentence was written; saying it was the only one *as of* some date would be better. Is the Star Wars Journal series completely first-person? 68.44.13.236 18:14, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- I put as of 2007 in there. SW Journals seems too short to be novels. More like novellas, I guess. -Fnlayson 22:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe call it a "full-length novel", then? 68.44.13.236 07:37, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Timeline?
Edit
So, if the novel is first-person, is it known when Corran wrote it? 68.44.13.236 05:58, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Soft Rebooting???
Edit
- " The novel also transitions a number of characters from the Rogue Squadron comics, which were also penned by Stackpole, into the realm of Expanded Universe novels by way of soft-rebooting them into the events of Anderson's earlier trilogy. "
OK what does "soft-rebooting" mean exactly??? I tried to look this up to no avail. Can we reword this or at least explain what it means??? -- Frank V Bonura 04:26, January 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Well if we can't get a definition/explanation of this sentence, perhaps its best if we removed it??? -- Frank V Bonura 14:23, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. jSarek 14:27, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. -- Frank V Bonura 16:35, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Agreed. jSarek 14:27, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
Force Sever?
Edit
Is there a mention of Force Sever in this book? When they are interrogating the Jensaari, Corran says something to the effect of "Luke blocked your connection to the force" (not the exact quote). Should we put a link to this under the force on misc? Lieutenant J.J 00:28, July 23, 2011 (UTC) Lieutenant J.J