Wikia

Wookieepedia

Watchlist Recent changes

Talk:Inexpugnable-class tactical command ship

Back to page

Wiki-shrinkable.png

This is the talk page for the article "Inexpugnable-class tactical command ship."

This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

Kotorlogo.png

Inexpugnable-class tactical command ship is within the scope of WookieeProject Knights of the Old Republic, an attempt to build comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating in the Knights of the Old Republic metaseries.
If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Article milestones
Date Process Result
28 October 2009 Featured article candidate Success
30 March 2010 Featured article
Current status: Featured article

Contents

Should it not be 'Inexpungable'?Edit

As far as I am aware, the word "Inexpugnable" is mentioned only once in canon (in the Knights of the Old Republic Handbook). If this is the case, I suspect that may be a misspelling in that publication. I know the word 'expunge' means 'to delete or remove', and while I have not found 'inexpungable' in any dictionary, it seems clear that it might be used to mean 'cannot be deleted or removed'. I've no idea what 'inexpugnable' might mean, though, hence my suspicions. Can anybody shed any light on this? -Kev-La Ttolya 11:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

  • I have discovered that my suspicion was unfounded. I made a sneaky search of the Bloomsbury Concise English Dictionary (Second Edition) in a local shop and learnt a couple of things: 'Inexpugnable' means 'impossible to take by force' or 'impossible to overcome', while 'inexpungible' means what I thought, but is spelt with a second 'i'.-Kev-La Ttolya 09:43, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Doesn't matter. Misspelled or not, it's canon. You can't fix it. -- Darth Culator (Talk) 09:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
    • I am not trying to "fix" canon. I was merely wondering if the word was misspelt, and as it turns out, it is not. As I stated in my previous post above.-Kev-La Ttolya 10:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Model? Edit

Shouldn't Inexpugnable-class be added to the model section in the infobox? I don't want to mess with this article since it's a FA, and I am not sure if my question is correct. TK-299 (Click Here) Imperial Emblem.svg 11:38, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Sixth Inexpugnable - Diligence?Edit

I made an edit in the Behind the Scenes section a short time ago concerning the sixth Inexpugnable-class ship, due to a comment I saw on the JC Forums from John Jackson Miller confirming that the sixth ship is in fact Diligence. This was shortly thereafter erased by another user. I realize that it was not in a canon work, but as the edit in question was in the behind the scenes section (i.e., referring to statements by the author like the one I was referring to) and Wookieepedia has an article relating to an Inexpugnable named Diligence, I thought it was justified. Tjace 04:59, February 3, 2011 (UTC)


Unidentified support ships Edit

If you look at the article's top picture,there are 8 ships flanking the Inexpugnable, 4 are Hammerhead-class cruisers, but below them are 4 more which are unidentified. I've been through the republic navy page, i've searched the Great Sith war, Mandalorian Wars, and the Jedi Civil war sections, there is no mention of them. I was just wondering if anyone could Identify them --216.104.107.216 23:30, April 7, 2012 (UTC)

Pages on Wookieepedia

Add a Page
93,405pages on
this wiki

Latest Photos

Add an Image
49,808images on this wiki
See more >

Recent Wiki Activity

See more >

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki