This is the talk page for the article "Kharrus." This space is used for discussion relating to changes to the article, not for a discussion about the topic in question. Please remember to stay civil and sign all of your comments with four tildes (~~~~). Click here to start a new topic.

"This point forward, we are entering uncharted territory." Kharrus is within the scope of WookieeProject: The Clone Wars, an effort to develop comprehensive and detailed articles with topics originating in or related to the Star Wars: The Clone Wars television series. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice or visit our project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.

Was Kharrus present at Palpatine's office when Jabba contacted him after the Battle of Christophsis? I think he is with Onaconda Farr --El Fantástico Juansaman 19:47, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

I don't know, but he is Gran, and the other guy is definitely Onaconda Farr. I have the movie on my computer, I just checked.--Darth Nixa 20:35, 10 January 2009 (UTC)DarthNixa

As far as I discovered, the movie is full with characters that are appearing through the series, at least for the first season, as Onaconda, Kharrus and Gha Nachkt. --El Fantástico Juansaman 14:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

That it Kharrus in the film that says this book: Star Wars: The Clone Wars: The Official Episode Guide: Season 1

Senator of Hok? Edit

Given that Senator Ask Aak represents Malastare and the Gran Protectorate and the fact that Hok is in the Inner Rim or deeper to the core, could Kharrus and later on Philo represent Hok and the Gran on the planet?--User:Shannon.JediKnight Shannon.JediKnight 02:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

• They could have been Aak's co-Senators. In TPM Malastare was also represented by Aks Moe, Baskol Yeesrim and Ainlee Teem. --Sompeetalay 18:57, February 21, 2010 (UTC)

Why died only the Gran Senators from Hok?Edit

Why died only Kharrus and Philo and not other Senators? —Unsigned comment by 84.133.207.165 (talk • contribs).

• Simply because they did. There's no explanation for why they died. —CC7567 ^(s)talk 17:29, 7 April 2009 (UTC)